1. GENERAL INFORMATION
a.
Use of radar data in OE/OD
investigation processes remains one of the most accurate methods
available to re-create events. Because
of the importance placed on radar data in the determination of the
facts surrounding incidents, it is imperative that this data be
processed and analyzed using clearly defined procedures that eliminate
localized interpretations of how best to extract, present, and assess
the information.
b.
NTAP, SATORI, CDR plots,
Radar Audio Playback Terminal Operations Recording (RAPTOR), Radar
View Point, MSDT ATC Plot and other reduction or playback tools are
available to assist in investigations. As
technological advances are made, the ATC system must adjust to these
changes and ensure that radar reduction tools are used correctly and
consistently throughout the system in order to provide the most
accurate recreation possible.
c.
NTAP, SATORI, CDR data,
and other reduction or playback tools shall not be arbitrarily used as
the primary initiating source (triggering event) for reporting an OE/OD
or commencing an investigation.
However, these reduction/playback tools may be used in the
investigation of suspected incidents to determine the amount of
separation that existed or the position of aircraft.
Additionally, these tools may be used for individual employee
performance review/improvement and/or system/facility evaluation. When
this is accomplished and a loss of separation is discovered, that
error shall be reported, but attributed to the facility as a facility
error. Skill enhancement training may be assigned to those
employees determined to be contributory to these events. However,
decertification shall not be imposed.
d.
SATORI, RAPTOR or other
playback tool may be used in the investigation of a QAR, suspected OE/OD,
pilot deviation, NMAC, TCAS event, miscellaneous incident, or
accident; to determine the relative flight tracks, speeds, headings,
location and separation of the involved aircraft.
These tools may be used to determine employee and/or pilot performance
and/or involvement in the incident, as well the closest proximity.
2. NATIONAL TRACK ANALYSIS PROGRAM (NTAP)
a.
NTAP was originally designed to assist in Search and Rescue
missions aimed at locating missing or suspected downed aircraft. This
program has inherent limitations when used to measure aircraft
separation. Three of the
major limitations in using NTAP plots to measure separation distances
are the following:
(1)
High-speed printer
limitations, due to design and physical characteristics of the
high-speed printer preclude accurate plotting of NTAP aircraft
position symbols.
(2)
Multiple radar data
processing creates a compound environment of surveillance sites with
unsynchronized radar scans, producing aircraft target updates in
non-uniform time frames.
(3)
Manual
measurements and smoothing of flight
tracks are subject to human error, creative interpretation, and
optical parallax. In
addition, target symbol positions being measured may not accurately
represent relative aircraft positional information.
b.
Because of the above limitations, use of NTAP for measuring
aircraft separation values, requires specific guidelines to ensure
system credibility. The
following procedures shall be used when using NTAP for OE/OD
determinations:
(1)
NTAP may be used for OE/OD
determinations at an en-route facility provided all the following
conditions are met:
(a)
A plot size of one-inch equals
one-mile is used.
(b)
For aircraft speeds of less than
250 knots, input times shall be at least 2 minutes before and after
the time of the triggering OEDP alert.
For speeds above 250 knots use at least 1 minute before and
after the alert time.
(c)
The following plot
keywords are used:
1.
PRI (primary targets); or
2.
BCN (beacon targets); or
3.
LDB (limited data blocks);
or
4.
SEL (select plots only BCN
or LDB associated with particular beacon codes input on the code
card); or
NOTE:
SEL is a stand-alone option or can be used as a sub-option of BCN to
plot aircraft on particular beacon codes.
5.
A combination of the above
options.
6.
LST
A (list data), a special plot keyword is used to create separate data
listings for each of the four list (LST)
options.
(d)
1/5 mile is added to the distance between the printed symbol
centers before making a determination. This accommodates the
high-speed printer limitations.
(e)
If target position jumps have occurred, a smoothed line shall
be drawn indicating the most probable flight path of the involved
aircraft. That line shall
be used for measurement purposes.
When determining the most probable flight path, ensure that a
maximum number of printed target symbols are used in the smoothing
process.
(f)
The NTAP plot is used to
declare an OE/OD only if the Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)
providing the computer data was responsible for the separation of the
aircraft involved.
c.
Computer operational error detection software (OEDP)
measurements are more precise than NTAP measurements. An error
detection alert measurement cannot be invalidated by an NTAP plot
measurement by the ARTCC receiving the alert unless at least one
target position, used by HOST in the generation of the alert message,
is clearly identified as a significant target jump.
All original NTAP plots used to invalidate OEDP alerts shall be
forwarded to the facilitys QA office for review, and shall be
retained for 45 days.
d.
LST 5 measurements data
are more precise than NTAP measurements. When ever possible a LST 5
shall be used to determine closest proximity.
3. CONTINUOUS DATA RECORDING (CDR)
a.
When CDR data is used in
an OE/OD investigation(s) the Automated Radar Terminal Systems (ARTS)
clock shall be verified as accurate.
In addition, any plotted depiction of targets derived from CDR
data shall be certified as accurate and valid.
A statement of such certification shall be added to the plot
depiction.
4. CDR EXTRACTION and/or VOICE RECORDING REQUEST for RAPTOR
CDR Playback
a.
When a CDR extraction and/or voice recording is requested, please
use the following guidelines below. It is imperative that
extractions are made exactly as listed below. Please do not
deviate from these specifications unless instructed/requested to do so
by AAT-200.
b.
CDR EXTRACTIONS do not use
any filters except for time, Data Class and subsystem (radar sensor)
unless specifically requested.
(1)
Extract the data, using
CDR-Editor or similar extraction tool as follows:
(2)
Data classes for ARTS IIE
and IIIE systems=TA, TU, TG
and CR
(3)
Data classes for ARTS IIIA
systems=TD and TG.
(4)
Save as a single
file in ASCII format ending in .TXT.
(5)
For multiple sensor
systems, identify the sensor number in use or filter all but primary
the sensor in use.
(6)
Please identify and/or
provide an electronic copy of the radar map most likely in use during
the event.
c.
VOICE
RECORDINGS
(1)
If a time
channel is not included or a digital voice file is created without a
time reference, include the exact time (hh:mm:ss UTC) of the first
radio transmission that can be correlated with radar display
information.
(2)
When
voice recordings are also requested, please indicate the time
difference, if any, between the recorder clock and the ARTS clock and
ensure you provide the start times and ensure both the time channel
and voice is audible.