Briefing Guide - Basic
Table of Contents
|
Paragraph
Number |
Title |
|
4-3-1 |
LETTERS OF AGREEMENT
|
|
CHAPTER 11
SECTION 9 |
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
SAFETY LOGIC SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR/CIC PROCEDURES |
|
11-9-1 |
SYSTEM OPERATION
|
|
11-9-2 |
ENSURE STATUS
|
|
11-9-3 |
MONITOR ALERTS AND ENSURE
CORRECTIVE ACTION |
|
11-9-4 |
RAIN CONFIGURATION
|
|
11-9-5 |
LIMITED CONFIGURATION
|
|
17-5-11 |
PROCESSING RESTRICTIONS
FOR FACILITIES WITH NTML |
|
17-11-1 |
GENERAL |
|
17-11-2 |
DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
17-12-2 |
RESPONSIBILITIES
|
|
17-15-6 |
PROCEDURES |
|
17-18-2 |
POLICY |
|
17-18-6 |
PROCEDURES |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 4-3-1. LETTERS OF AGREEMENT
2. BACKGROUND:
Flight Standards has implemented a new policy for airplane operators engaged in
air transportation that requires additional assessment of landing distance
requirements based on the conditions present at the time of arrival. This policy
requires that the flight crew calculate their required landing distance
accounting for the runway contamination type and depth, or most recent braking
action report for the runway to be used under the landing performance assessment
policy. Some aircraft will begin to be restricted when braking action reports of
"fair" are received. With the current Air Traffic Control (ATC) threshold of
"poor" for placing advisory information on the Automatic Terminal Information
Service (ATIS) the flight crews of these aircraft would not have any indication
that they may be runway restricted until actually making radio contact with the
tower controller. This late information could add additional workload for the
flight crew at a very critical time of flight, and potentially lead to an
unnecessary go-around with the resultant effects on the ATC workload. Therefore
we are taking action to change the trigger for "BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES ARE IN
EFFECT" on the ATIS to any time a "fair" or worse braking action report is
received.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
4-3-1. LETTERS OF
AGREEMENT |
|
4-3-1. LETTERS OF
AGREEMENT |
|
Title through
g2 |
|
No Change |
|
3. Exchanging
braking action reports with the airport management. As a minimum, procedures
shall provide for the prompt exchange of reports which indicate runway
braking conditions have deteriorated to "poor" or "nil" or have improved to
"good". |
|
3. Exchange
braking action reports with the airport management. As a minimum, procedures
shall provide for the prompt exchange of reports which indicate runway
braking conditions have deteriorated to "fair," "poor,"
or "nil" or have improved to "good." |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE:
CHAPTER 11. NATIONAL PROGRAMS,
SECTION 9. SAFETY LOGIC SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR/CIC PROCEDURES
2. BACKGROUND:
The term "supervisor" has been renamed to "front-line manager" to more
accurately reflect the level of responsibility inherent in this position.
References to ASDE-3X have been removed with this upgrade.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
Chapter 11. National
Programs |
|
Chapter 11. National
Programs |
|
Section 9. Safety
Logic Systems Supervisor/CIC Procedures |
|
Section 9. Safety
Logic Systems Front-Line Manager/CIC Procedures |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE: 11-9-1. SYSTEM OPERATION
2. BACKGROUND:
ASDE-X Build 5.0.7.2 incorporates an upgrade to the ASDE radar system to include
Rain Configuration to be used during periods of moderate to extreme
precipitation to avoid the likelihood of false alerts. References to ASDE-3X
have been removed with this upgrade.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
11-9-1. SYSTEM
OPERATION |
|
11-9-1. SYSTEM
OPERATION |
|
a. Safety Logic
Systems are software enhancements to the ASDE-3, ASDE-X, and
ASDE-3X that predict the path of aircraft landing and/or departing,
and/or vehicular movements on runways. Visual and aural alerts are activated
when the safety logic projects a potential collision. |
|
a. Safety Logic
Systems are software enhancements to the ASDE-3 and ASDE-X
that predict the path of aircraft landing and/or departing, and/or vehicular
movements on runways. Visual and aural alerts are activated when the safety
logic projects a potential collision. |
|
1. AMASS is a
safety logic system enhancement to the ASDE-3 SMR. |
|
1. AMASS is a
safety logic system enhancement to the ASDE-3. |
|
2. The
ASDE-X Safety Logic System is an integral part of the software program.
|
|
2. ASDE-X
Safety Logic is a system enhancement to ASDE-X. |
|
3.
ASDE-3X uses the ASDE-X Safety Logic System. |
|
Delete |
|
b. The Safety
Logic System shall be operated in a full core alert runway configuration.
|
|
b. The Safety
Logic System shall be operated in a full core alert runway configuration.
(In ASDE X, when rain configuration is selected, it includes full core
alerting capabilities.) |
|
c. When ASDE-3
and/or AMASS is in maintenance mode, AMASS data shall be considered invalid
and the system shall be taken offline. The supervisor/CIC shall
validate, upon resumption of normal AMASS operations, that runway
configurations and other user settings are adequate for operational use.
|
|
c. When ASDE-3
and/or AMASS is in maintenance mode, AMASS data shall be considered invalid
and the system shall be taken offline. The front-line manager/CIC
shall validate, upon resumption of normal AMASS operations, that runway
configurations and other user settings are adequate for operational use.
|
|
NOTE-
Action to change AMASS online/offline status is a Technical
Operations function. ASDE-X and ASDE-3X safety logic will
automatically be disabled when the system is in maintenance mode.
|
|
NOTE-
Action to change AMASS online/offline status is a Technical
Operations function. ASDE-X safety logic will automatically be disabled when
the system is in maintenance mode. |
|
d. When a
runway becomes unavailable for aircraft operations for an extended period of
time, the runway should be entered as, "Closed" in the Safety Logic System.
Facility procedures should be developed to address using the Safety Logic
System in this capacity. |
|
No Change |
|
e. Construction
projects in the vicinity of runways may cause nuisance or false alerts. The
NASE may be able to provide an adaptation to filter the affected areas from
Safety Logic System coverage. Facilities shall contact the NASE via email at
9-AMC-AOS-AMASS@faa.gov, 30 to 45 days before the construction is scheduled
to begin to assist in determining whether an adaptation is necessary.
|
|
e. Construction
projects in the vicinity of runways may cause nuisance or false alerts. The
National Airway Systems Engineering (NASE) group
may be able to provide an adaptation to filter the affected areas from
Safety Logic System coverage. Facilities shall contact NASE via email at
either 9-AMC-ATOW-ASDE-X@faa.gov or 9-AMC-AOS-AMASS@faa.gov, 30
to 45 days before the construction is scheduled to begin to assist in
determining whether an adaptation is necessary. |
|
Add |
|
f. ASDE-X false
targets may be temporarily track dropped after positive verification has
been accomplished via pilot/vehicle operator position report or controller
visual observation. When a false target is temporarily dropped, it shall be
noted on FAA Form 7230-4, Daily Record of Facility Operation.
|
|
Add |
|
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 3-6-2, Identification. |
|
Add |
|
g. The Air
Traffic Manager may authorize a real target to be inhibited from safety
logic processing when the target will likely generate a nuisance alert.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE: 11-9-2. ENSURE STATUS
2. BACKGROUND:
The responsibility to ensure that the Safety Logic System (SLS) is correctly
configured is assigned to the front-line manager/CIC. In addition, the
front-line manager/CIC is assigned the responsibility to verbally brief each
operational position and to note any status changes to the SLS on FAA Form
7230-4, Daily Record of Facility Operation.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
11-9-2. ENSURE STATUS
|
|
11-9-2. ENSURE STATUS
|
|
a. The
supervisor/CIC is responsible for ensuring that the Safety Logic System
is set for the correct runway configuration. |
|
a. The
front-line manager/CIC is responsible for ensuring that the Safety
Logic System is set for the correct runway configuration. |
|
b. The
supervisor/CIC shall ensure that the operational status of the Safety
Logic System is known to all operational personnel. |
|
b. The
front-line manager/CIC shall ensure that the operational status of
the Safety Logic System is known to all operational personnel. |
|
c. When a
status change is made to the Safety Logic System (i.e., online or
offline, or limited configuration), all personnel assigned an
operational position shall be notified verbally. |
|
c. When a
status change is made to the Safety Logic System all personnel assigned an
operational position shall be notified verbally. |
|
d. When the
Safety Logic System is offline, it shall be noted on FAA Form 7230-4,
Daily Record of Facility Operation. Such status shall be shown in the
facility Status Information Area (SIA). The supervisor/CIC shall
ensure that all outages are carried over on applicable logs. |
|
d. When
any status change is made to the Safety Logic System it shall be
noted on FAA Form 7230-4, Daily Record of Facility Operation. Such status
shall be shown in the facility Status Information Area (SIA). The
front-line manager/CIC shall ensure that all outages are carried
over on applicable logs. |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE: 11-9-3. MONITOR ALERTS AND ENSURE CORRECTIVE ACTION
2. BACKGROUND:
The requirement to ensure that all Safety Logic System (SLS) alerts are
monitored and documented in facility logs is the responsibility of the
front-line manager/CIC. Technical Operations (Tech Ops) shall be notified
whenever the SLS generates a false alert. After Tech Ops gathers the necessary
data, the system must be returned to full-core alerting. If the front-line
manager/CIC determines that a "persistent" false alert is occurring, the system
may be operated in Limited Configuration.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
11-9-3. MONITOR ALERTS
AND ENSURE CORRECTIVE ACTION |
|
11-9-3. MONITOR ALERTS
AND ENSURE CORRECTIVE ACTION |
|
a. The
Supervisor/CIC shall ensure that the Safety Logic System is monitored
and all alerts are complied with. |
|
a. The
front-line manager/CIC shall ensure that the Safety Logic System is
monitored and all alerts are complied with. |
|
b. All Safety
Logic System alerts generated shall be documented on FAA Form 7230-4. If
unable to determine the origin of an alert, treat the alert as false.
|
|
b. All Safety
Logic System alerts generated shall be documented on FAA Form 7230-4. If
unable to determine the origin of an alert, treat the alert as false
and notify Technical Operations so that corrective action can be taken.
|
|
NOTE-
The purpose of logging Safety Logic System alerts is to track the
reliability and performance of the system. Therefore, the Quality Assurance
Review (QAR) process shall not be used for false or nuisance alerts.
|
|
c. The
purpose of logging Safety Logic System alerts is to track the reliability
and performance of the system. Therefore, the Quality Assurance Review (QAR)
process shall not be used for false or nuisance alerts. |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE: 11-9-4. RAIN CONFIGURATION
2. BACKGROUND:
Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X (ASDE-X) Safety Logic Systems Build
5.0.7.2 and Airport Movement Area Safety System Build 5.11.1 (AMASS)
incorporates an upgrade to the ASDE/AMASS radar system to include Rain
Configuration which is to be used during periods of moderate to extreme
precipitation to avoid the likelihood of false alerts. Rain Configuration in
ASDE-X provides full-core runway alerting for Taxi into Position and Hold
purposes. Rain configuration in AMASS is essentially the same as Limited
Configuration and only provides an arrival alert to a closed runway. Therefore,
AMASS in Rain or Limited Configuration is not full-core runway alert status.
References to ASDE-3X have been removed with this upgrade.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
Add |
|
11-9-4. RAIN
CONFIGURATION |
|
Add |
|
a. Due to the
required sensitivity of surface movement radars, numerous false targets may
be generated by moderate to extreme precipitation. During these periods the
ASDE-X and AMASS Safety Logic Systems should be operated in rain
configuration. Should precipitation of this magnitude occur or be imminent,
rain configuration may be applied to avoid the likelihood of false alerts.
|
|
Add |
|
b. When the
event that led to placing the system into rain configuration is no longer a
factor, the Safety Logic System must be reset to a normal configuration.
|
|
Add |
|
NOTE-
When AMASS is in rain configuration all safety logic alerts with the
exception of arrivals to a closed runway are inhibited and AMASS is not in
full core alert status. |
|
11-9-4 and
11-9-5 |
|
Renumbered 11-9-5
and 11-9-6 |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE: 11-9-5. LIMITED CONFIGURATION
2. BACKGROUND:
Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X (ASDE-X) Safety Logic System (SLS)
Build 5.0.7.2 and Airport Movement Area Safety System (AMASS) incorporate an
upgrade to the ASDE/AMASS radar system to include Rain Configuration which is to
be used during periods of moderate to extreme precipitation to avoid the
likelihood of false alerts. Limited Configuration in ASDE-X shall be used when
"persistent" false alerts occur or when rain mode is unavailable. Limited
Configuration is not full-core runway alert status for the use of Taxi into
Position and Hold (TIPH) procedures. Because not all persistent alerts are
caused by precipitation, it is necessary to log and notify Technical Operations
(Tech Ops) whenever the system status is changed to Limited Configuration.
Except in the cases of persistent false alerts, AMASS SLS shall be returned to
full-core alert status when Tech Ops advises that they have obtained the data
necessary to analyze the event. References to ASDE-3X have been removed with
this upgrade.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
11-9-4. LIMITED
CONFIGURATION |
|
11-9-5. LIMITED
CONFIGURATION |
|
a. Under
certain circumstances, there may be a need to operate the Safety Logic
System in limited configuration. The limited configuration shall only be
used for the following reasons: |
|
a. Under
certain circumstances, there may be a need to operate the Safety Logic
System in limited configuration. The limited configuration shall only be
used to temporarily inhibit persistent false alerts. The term
"persistent false alert" refers to frequent false alerts caused by
continuous or repetitive circumstances. False alerts caused by random events
or circumstances of short duration are not considered "persistent false
alerts." The determination of "persistent alerts" is at the discretion of
each front-line manager/CIC. |
|
1.
Moderate to Heavy Precipitation. Due to the required sensitivity of surface
movement radars, numerous targets may be caused by precipitation of moderate
or greater intensity. Should precipitation of this magnitude occur or be
imminent, limited configuration may be applied to avoid the likelihood of
nuisance alerts. |
|
b. Due to the
required sensitivity of surface movement radars, numerous false targets may
be caused by precipitation of moderate or greater intensity. Should
precipitation of this magnitude occur or be imminent at locations where ASDE
does not have rain configuration availability, limited configuration may be
applied to avoid the likelihood of false alerts. |
|
2.
False Alerting. Following the determination of a false alert, limited
configuration should be applied and Technical Operations notified. Once the
cause of the alert has been identified by Technical Operations and/or NASE,
the availability of the Safety Logic System in full core alerting will be at
the discretion of the facility management, taking into account the cause of
the false alert, any pending resolution to the false alert, and the
recommendation of Technical Operations or NASE. |
|
c. When it is
necessary to operate the ASDE-X Safety Logic System in limited configuration
due to "persistent false alerts," notify Technical Operations so that
corrective action can be taken. |
|
Add |
|
d. When an AMASS
false alert is received, limited configuration shall only be used until
Technical Operations verifies that the system is functioning properly and
that the data necessary to analyze the alert has been obtained. Analysis and
resolution of the circumstances surrounding the false alert will be
determined by Technical Operations at a later date. |
|
Add |
|
e. When limited
configuration is applied, it shall be noted on FAA Form 7230-4, Daily Record
of Facility Operation, including the reason for the configuration change.
Ensure that all limited configurations are carried over on applicable logs.
|
|
NOTE-
1. For AMASS, the limited configuration disables all alerts
except arrivals to a closed runway.
2. For ASDE- X and ASDE-3X, the limited configuration
disables all alerts except arrivals to and departures on a closed runway.
3 through c
|
|
NOTE-
1. For AMASS, the limited configuration disables all alerts
except arrivals to a closed runway and is not considered full-core
alert status.
2. For ASDE-X the limited configuration disables all alerts except
arrivals to and departures on a closed runway and is not considered
full-core alert status.
Delete |
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND
TITLE:
17-5-11. PROCESSING RESTRICTIONS FOR FACILITIES WITH NTML,
17-11-1. GENERAL,
17-11-2. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES,
17-12-2. RESPONSIBILITIES,
17-15-6. PROCEDURES,
17-18-2. POLICY, AND
17-18-6. PROCEDURES
2. BACKGROUND:
The Severe Weather Area (SVRWX) at the David J. Hurley Air Traffic Control
System Command Center (ATCSCC) has been dissolved. The National System Strategy
Team (NSST) was created to incorporate a number of management functions into one
location. Among those functions are the Planner, National En Route Spacing
Position (NESP), Tactical Airspace Manager (TAM), International Operations
Manager (IOM), Regional Airspace Managers (RAM), and others.
3. CHANGE:
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-5-11. PROCESSING
RESTRICTIONS FOR FACILITIES WITH NTML |
|
17-5-11. PROCESSING
REQUESTS FOR REROUTES AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FACILITIES WITH NTML
|
|
Title through
b |
|
No Change |
|
c. Restrictions/modifications
associated with reroutes: |
|
c. Requests for
reroutes and associated restrictions/modifications: |
|
1.
Restrictions will be discussed during the development of the reroute.
|
|
1. Field
facilities must share Flow Evaluation Areas (FEA) that may require
implementation of traffic management initiatives. If requesting a reroute in
conjunction with a shared FEA, notify the ATCSCC National System Strategy
Team (NSST) via the NTML of the FEA and the proposed reroute. Any facility
requiring a restriction in conjunction with a reroute must enter the
initiative into NTML via the RSTN template with the SVR WX RERTE button
enabled and transmit to the NSST. |
|
2. Any
facility requiring a restriction in conjunction with a reroute must enter
the initiative into the RSTN template with the SVR WX RERTE button enabled.
Modifications to previously approved restrictions with a reroute must be
verbally coordinated through the ATCSCC Severe Weather Unit prior to
submitting in NTML. |
|
2. The
ATCSCC NSST must monitor NTML and respond to field facility requests for
reroutes and restrictions associated with shared FEAs. The NSST must
evaluate reroute requests and, if applicable, conference the appropriate
facilities to coordinate the reroute. Restrictions will be discussed during
the development of the reroute. |
|
Add |
|
3. When
applicable, the NSST must transmit the reroute and enter approved
restrictions in the NTML. |
|
Add |
|
4. Modifications
to previously approved reroutes and associated restrictions must be verbally
coordinated through the NSST prior to submitting the modification via NTML.
|
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-11-1. GENERAL
|
|
17-11-1. GENERAL
|
|
a. The AT
system is most susceptible to thunder-storm activity between April and
October on a national basis. Thunderstorms create a major disruption to the
normal and organized movement of air traffic and significantly increase the
workload in an impacted facility. To meet this challenge, System Operations
has charged the ATCSCC to set aside a cadre of TMSs to deal directly
and independently with severe weather problem areas. To accomplish this
task, the ATCSCC established severe weather management teams.
|
|
a. The AT
system is most susceptible to thunderstorm activity between April and
October on a national basis. Thunderstorms create a major disruption to the
normal and organized movement of air traffic and significantly increase the
workload in an impacted facility. To meet this challenge, System Operations
has charged the ATCSCC to set aside a cadre of National Traffic
Management Officers (NTMO) to deal directly and independently with
severe weather problem areas. To accomplish this task, the ATCSCC
established the National System Strategy Team (NSST).
|
|
b. When the
potential for severe weather exists which will cause a disruption to normal
traffic movements, the ATCSCC severe weather management specialists
will implement procedures designed to optimize the use of the available
airspace. Strategic planning is an integral part of severe weather
management and the responsibility of all involved. |
|
b. When the
potential for severe weather exists which will cause a disruption to normal
traffic movements, the ATCSCC NSST will implement procedures
designed to optimize the use of the available airspace. Strategic planning
is an integral part of severe weather management and the responsibility of
all involved. |
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-11-2. DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
17-11-2. DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
The ATCSCC shall
be the final approving authority for alternate routes and initiatives that
transcend center or terminal boundaries. |
|
The ATCSCC must
be the final approving authority for alternate routes and initiatives that
transcend center or terminal boundaries. |
|
a. The ATCSCC
severe weather management supervisor shall: |
|
a. The ATCSCC
NSST must: |
|
1 |
|
No Change |
|
2. Ensure
coordination is completed to develop severe weather strategies.
|
|
2. Ensure
coordination is completed to implement TM initiatives in support of
severe weather management. |
|
NOTE-
ATCSCC NTMOs shall be responsible for the implementation of TM
initiatives in support of severe weather management. |
|
Delete |
|
3. Conduct
special weather TELCONs, when appropriate. |
|
3. Conduct
a daily NSST operations critique with affected facilities and system
customers, as appropriate. |
|
4. Conduct a
daily severe weather operations critique with ATCSCC severe weather
management specialists, affected facilities, and system users, as
appropriate. |
|
4.
Receive and evaluate facility requests for alternate routes and initiatives
to avoid severe weather. |
|
Add |
|
5. Coordinate
with appropriate facilities and customers to determine the need for
developing alternate routes and initiatives to avoid severe weather.
|
|
Add |
|
6. Coordinate
alternate routes with all affected facilities. |
|
Add |
|
7. Transmit
advisories defining severe weather areas and alternate routes.
|
|
Add |
|
8. Conference
all affected facilities and system users to apprise them of weather
conditions that will impact the NAS. |
|
b. The
ATCSCC severe weather management specialist shall: |
|
b. Facility TMUs
must coordinate directly with the ATCSCC NSST for matters pertaining to
severe weather. |
|
1 through c
|
|
Delete |
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-12-2.
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
17-12-2.
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
Title through
a6 |
|
No Change |
|
b. ATCSCC
severe weather management specialist shall: |
|
b. The
ATCSCC NSST must: |
|
1 and 2
|
|
No Change |
|
3. Formulate a
dynamic severe weather operational plan. Coordinate TM initiatives
and alternate routes with all affected facilities. |
|
3. Formulate a
dynamic severe weather operational plan and coordinate TM
initiatives and alternate routes with all affected facilities. |
|
4 |
|
No Change |
|
Add |
|
(a) Capping and
tunneling initiatives. |
|
(a) through
(c) |
|
Renumbered (b)
through (d) |
|
Add |
|
(e) Airspace
flow programs. |
|
5 |
|
No Change |
|
6. Be the final
approving authority for traffic flows and reroutes. |
|
6. Be the final
approving authority for traffic flows, reroutes, and MIT
associated with reroutes. |
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-15-6. PROCEDURES
|
|
17-15-6. PROCEDURES
|
|
a. Facilities
shall notify ATCSCC when implementing and terminating CDRs in
accordance with para 17-14-2, Duties and Responsibility. |
|
a. Facilities
must notify ATCSCC when implementing and terminating CDRs.
|
|
b. The ATCSCC
shall issue an advisory in accordance with para 17-13-2, Duties
and Responsibilities, when facilities are implementing or terminating
CDRs. |
|
b. The ATCSCC
must issue an advisory when facilities are implementing or
terminating CDRs. |
|
c. Facilities
shall make real-time reports of unusable or inaccurate CDRs through
the Severe Weather Specialist for follow-up by the ATCSCC POC.
|
|
c. Facilities
must make real-time reports of unusable or inaccurate CDRs
through the ATCSCC National System Strategy Team (NSST) for
follow-up by the ATCSCC POC. |
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-18-2. POLICY
|
|
17-18-2. POLICY
|
|
Facilities and the
ATCSCC shall use National Playbook routes in preference to ad hoc
routes. National Playbook routes shall only be used after
collaboration and coordination between the ATCSCC Severe Weather Unit
and the Traffic Management Unit(s) of affected air traffic facilities.
|
|
Facilities and the
ATCSCC must use National Playbook routes in preference to ad
hoc routes. National Playbook routes must only be used after
collaboration and coordination between the ATCSCC National System
Strategy Team (NSST) and the Traffic Management Unit(s) of affected
air traffic facilities. |
|
OLD |
|
NEW |
|
17-18-6. PROCEDURES
|
|
17-18-6. PROCEDURES
|
|
a. National
Playbook routes are considered active when the ATCSCC Regional Airspace
Manager (RAM) has completed coordination with all impacted facilities.
An ATCSCC numbered advisory will be sent by the Severe Weather Unit
describing the route being used. |
|
a. National
Playbook routes are considered active when the ATCSCC NSST has
completed coordination with all impacted facilities. An ATCSCC numbered
advisory will be sent by the NSST describing the route being
used. |
|
b. National
Playbook routes may be modified tactically to achieve an operational
advantage. The ATCSCC RAM will coordinate these changes verbally with
all impacted facilities and insure that the published advisory contains the
modification(s). |
|
b. National
Playbook routes may be modified tactically to achieve an operational
advantage. The ATCSCC NSST will coordinate these changes
verbally with all impacted facilities and ensure that the published advisory
contains the modification(s). |
|
c. Facilities
shall monitor and provide real-time reports of the impact and
continued need for the use of the National Playbook route(s) through the
RAM. |
|
c. Facilities
must monitor and provide real-time reports of the impact and
continued need for the use of the National Playbook route(s) through the
ATCSCC NSST. |
|
d. A National
Playbook route is no longer active when the expiration time stated on the
advisory has been reached without an extension coordinated or a decision to
cancel the route has been reached. If the route is cancelled prior to the
expiration time, the ATCSCC RAM will coordinate with all impacted
facilities and publish an advisory stating that the route has been
cancelled. |
|
d. A National
Playbook route is no longer active when the expiration time stated on the
advisory has been reached without an extension coordinated or a decision to
cancel the route has been reached. If the route is cancelled prior to the
expiration time, the ATCSCC NSST will coordinate with all
impacted facilities and publish an advisory stating that the route has been
cancelled. |
|
e. If there are
circumstances that prevent the use of a National Playbook route, then the
air traffic facility involved shall inform the ATCSCC RAM. The
RAM will coordinate this information with the Planning Team (PT). It
is the responsibility of the impacted facility and the ATCSCC to ensure the
route is not utilized until the circumstance(s) preventing its use is
corrected or the route is deleted. |
|
e. If there are
circumstances that prevent the use of a National Playbook route, then the
air traffic facility involved must inform the ATCSCC
NSST. The ATCSCC NSST will coordinate this information
with the Planning Team (PT). It is the responsibility of the impacted
facility and the ATCSCC to ensure the route is not utilized until the
circumstance(s) preventing its use is corrected or the route is deleted.
|
|