Chapter 7. Determinations
Section 1. Issuing
Determinations
7-1-1. POLICY
All known aeronautical
facts revealed during the obstruction evaluation must be considered when issuing
an official FAA determination. The determination must be a composite of all
comments and findings received from interested FAA offices. Should there be a
disagreement in the findings, the disagreement must be resolved before issuance
of a determination. The basis for all determinations must be on the aeronautical
study findings as to the extent of adverse physical or electromagnetic
interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation facilities.
Evidence of adverse effect alone, either physical or electromagnetic, is not
sufficient justification for a determination of hazard. However, a finding of a
substantial physical or electromagnetic adverse effect normally requires
issuance of a determination of hazard.
7-1-2. RESPONSIBILITY
a. Air traffic is
responsible for issuing determinations.
b. If any division
objects to a structure that does not exceed Part 77, and/or is not found to have
a physical or electromagnetic radiation effect on the operation of air
navigation facilities, an advisory statement may be submitted to OEG for
inclusion in the determination. Examples would be:
1. Objections
identifying potential airport hazards based on airport design criteria such as a
structure within the runway protection zone (RPZ).
2. Objections
identifying potential airport hazards such as structures which may not be above
ground level (e.g., landfills, retention ponds, and waste recycling areas) but
may create an environment that attracts birds and other wildlife.
7-1-3. DETERMINATIONS
Determinations issued by
the FAA receive widespread public distribution and review. Therefore, it is
essential that each determination issued is consistent in form and content to
the extent practicable. To facilitate this and to achieve economy in clerical
handling, automated correspondence is available through the OE/AAA automation
program and must be used in lieu of previously approved FAA forms.
Determinations must be issued as follows:
a. Issue a “Does
Not Exceed" (automated DNE letter) determination if the structure does not
exceed obstruction standards, does not have substantial adverse physical or
electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation
facilities, and would not be a hazard to air navigation.
NOTE-
A determination indicating that No Notice is Required (NNR) is no longer
authorized.
b. Issue an
“Exceeds But Okay" (automated EBO letter) determination if the structure exceeds
obstruction standards but does not result in a substantial adverse effect,
circularization was not necessary, and meets one of the following conditions:
1. The structure
is temporary;
2. The structure
is existing; or
3. The structure
involves an alteration with no physical increase in height or change of location
such as a proposed decrease in height or proposed side mount.
NOTE-
The significant difference between an EBO determination and a “Determination of
No Hazard to Air Navigation" (DNH) is that the EBO determination does not allow
for petition rights.
c. Issue a “Notice
of Presumed Hazard" (automated NPH letter) if the structure exceeds obstruction
standards and/or has an adverse effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation
facilities and resolution or further study is necessary to fully determine the
extent of the adverse effect. The NPH facilitates negotiation and is useful in
preserving navigable airspace. Normally, the FAA should not automatically
initiate further study (including circularization) without a request to do so by
the sponsor. The intent of the NPH is to inform the sponsor of the initial
findings and to attempt resolution. If the sponsor fails to contact the FAA
after receiving the notice, terminate the case. No further action by the FAA is
required unless the sponsor re-files. If negotiation is successful, and
resolution is achieved, or further study is completed, an appropriate subsequent
determination should be issued.
d. Issue a “Determination of No Hazard" (DNH) if the structure exceeds
obstruction standards but does not result in a substantial adverse effect.
e. Issue a
“Determination of Hazard" (DOH) if the structure would have or has a substantial
adverse effect; negotiations with the sponsor have been unsuccessful in
eliminating the substantial adverse effect; and the affected aeronautical
operations and/or procedures cannot be adjusted to accommodate the structure
without resulting in a substantial adverse effect. The obstruction evaluation
may or may not have been circularized.
7-1-4. DETERMINATION
CONTENT AND OPTIONS
Use the following items,
as appropriate, to ensure that the necessary information is included in each
determination:
a. All no hazard
determinations must address or include:
1. FULL
DESCRIPTION. A full description of the structure, project, etc., including all
submitted frequencies and ERP must be included. Use exact information to clearly
identify the nature of the project (e.g., microwave antenna tower; FM, AM, or TV
antenna tower; suspension bridge; four-stack power plant; etc.).
2. LATITUDE,
LONGITUDE, AND HEIGHT. Specify the latitude, longitude, and height(s) of each
structure. When an obstruction evaluation study concerns an array of antennas or
other multiple-type structures, specific information on each structure should be
included.
3. MARKING AND/OR
LIGHTING. A marking and/or lighting recommendation must be a condition of the
determination when aeronautical study discloses that the marking and/or lighting
are necessary for aviation safety.
(a) If the OE
notice was for an existing structure with no physical alteration to height or
location (e.g., a side mount or an editorial correction to coordinates and/or
elevations due to more accurate data), and the structure was previously studied,
the recommended marking and/or lighting may be in accordance with the prior
study.
(b) If the notice
is for a new structure, a physical alteration (height/location) to an existing
structure, or an existing structure that did not involve a physical alteration
but was not previously studied, the recommended marking and/or lighting must be
in accordance with appropriate chapters of the current AC 70/7460-1, Obstruction
Marking and Lighting.
(c) If the OE
notice was for a change in marking and/or lighting of a prior study whether the
structure exists or not yet built, the recommended marking and/or lighting must
be in accordance with appropriate chapters of the current AC 70/7460-1.
(1) If it is an
existing FCC-licensed structure, and the requested marking and/or lighting
change is recommended, notify the sponsor to apply to the FCC for permission to
make the change. Use the following specific language: “If the structure is
subject to the authority of the Federal Communications Commission, a copy of
this letter must be forwarded to them and application should be made to the FCC
for permission to change the marking and/or lighting as requested." This
language is available in the automated letters.
(2) If the marking
and/or lighting change involves high intensity white obstruction lights on an
FCC-licensed structure, the sponsor must be notified that the FCC requires an
environmental assessment. Use the following specific language: “FCC licensees
are required to file an environmental assessment with the Commission when
seeking authorization for the use of the high intensity flashing white lighting
system on structures located in residential neighborhoods, as defined by the
applicable zoning law."
(3) If it is an
existing structure and the requested marking and/or lighting change is
recommended, the sponsor must be required to notify Aeronautical Navigation
Products (AeroNav) directly when the change has been accomplished. Use the
following specific language: “So that aeronautical charts and records can be
updated, please notify Aeronautical Navigation Products (AeroNav) in writing
(with a courtesy copy to the FAA's National Flight Data Center) when the new
system is installed and operational. AeroNav notification should be addressed
to: National Aeronautical Charting Office, Aeronautical Information Branch, Room
5601 N/ACC113, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910."
(d) If it is determined that marking and/or lighting are not necessary for
aviation safety, marking and/or lighting may be accomplished on a voluntary
basis. However, marking and/or lighting should not be a condition of the
determination. Instead, it must be recommended that voluntary marking and/or
lighting be installed and maintained in accordance with AC 70/7460-1. Use
specific language as follows: “Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting
are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are
accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained
in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1."
4. SUPPLEMENTAL
NOTICE. FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, Part 2, is
the authorized form for sponsors to report the start, completion, or abandonment
of construction, and the dismantlement of structures. Furnish this form to each
sponsor when supplemental notice is required. Each service area office must take
action to ensure that their return address is correct before sending the form to
the sponsor.
(a) When deemed
necessary, request sponsors to complete and mail Part 1 of FAA Form 7460-2, to
be received at least 10 days before the start of construction or alteration,
when:
(1) An
aeronautical procedure or minimum flight altitude will be affected (supplemental
notice earlier than 10 days may be requested to permit adjustments).
(2) The
construction will be in progress over an extended period of time.
(3) The structure
will exceed 500 feet AGL and will be erected within a relatively short period of
time, as in the case of a TV tower.
(b) In addition,
submission by the sponsor of FAA Form 7460-2, must be required when the
structure is a new construction or involves a proposed physical alteration, and:
(1) Is more than
200 feet above ground level (AGL).
(2) Is less than
200 feet AGL but exceeds obstruction standards, requires a change to an
established FAA procedure or flight minimum, requires certified accuracy so as
not to exceed minimums.
(3) The FAA deems
it necessary for any other reason.
(c) The
information submitted on FAA Form 7460-2 is used for:
(1) Charting
obstructions to air navigation on aeronautical charts.
(2) Giving notice
to airmen, when applicable, of the construction of obstructions.
(3) Changing
affected aeronautical procedures and operations.
(4) Revising
minimum flight altitudes.
(5) Updating the
AeroNav Obstacle Digital File.
(d) Do not require
supplemental notice for existing structures that do not involve a proposed
physical alteration. Instead, directly communicate the known information to
AeroNav and other relevant persons or organizations, as necessary.
5. EXPIRATION
DATE. Include an expiration date, if applicable.
(a) Assign an
expiration date to all determinations that involve new construction or
alterations.
(1) Normally all
determinations, whether FCC construction permit related or not, must be assigned
an expiration date 18 months from the effective/issued date. In the case of
determinations involving petition rights, the expiration must be 18 months from
the final date of the determination.
(2) If
circumstances warrant, an expiration date not to exceed 18 months should be
assigned.
(b) The
determination expires on the date prescribed unless:
(1) Extended,
revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(2) The
construction is subject to the licensing authority of the FCC and an application
for a construction permit has been filed as required by the FCC within six
months of the date of the determination. In such case, the determination expires
on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date
the FCC denies the application. A request for extension must be postmarked or
delivered at least 15 days prior to expiration.
(c) If the date of a final determination is changed because of a petition or
review, a new expiration date will be specified as appropriate.
(d) Determinations
involving existing structures that do not involve a proposed physical alteration
must not contain an expiration date.
6. SPECIAL
CONDITIONS. Any condition upon which a no hazard determination is based must be
specified in the determination. When FAA Form 7460-2 is requested, a condition
of the determination will be for the sponsor to keep the FAA informed of the
project's status. Use the following specific language: “As a result of this
structure being critical to flight safety, it is required that the FAA be kept
informed as to the status of the project. Failure to respond to periodic FAA
inquiries could invalidate this determination."
7. SPECIAL
STATEMENTS. To help prevent potential problems, all determinations must include
the following statements:
(a) “This
determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes
specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any change in
coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) or use of greater power will void this
determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase in
heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice
to the FAA."
(b) “This
determination does include temporary construction equipment, such as cranes,
derricks, etc., which may be used during the actual construction of the
structure. However, this equipment must not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure
requires separate notice to the FAA."
(c) “This
determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient
use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of
compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any
Federal, state, or local government body."
8. ADVISORIES.
Determinations may require advisory statements (available in the automated
letters) to notify sponsors of potential issues.
(a) Issues
pertaining to noise can be addressed as a statement in the determination with
the following language: “The structure considered under this study lies in
proximity to an airport and occupants may be subjected to noise from aircraft
operating to and from the airport."
(b) When requested
by the military, issues pertaining to military training areas/routes can be
addressed in a determination with the following language: “While the structure
does not constitute a hazard to air navigation, it would be located within or
near a military training area and/or route."
(c) Issues
pertaining to a runway protection zone can be addressed in the determination as
follows: “While the structure does not constitute a hazard to air navigation, it
would be located within the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) of the airport/runway.
Structures, which will result in the congregation of people within an RPZ, are
strongly discouraged in the interest of protecting people and property on the
ground. In cases where the airport owner can control the use of the property,
such structures are prohibited. In cases where the airport owner exercises no
such control, advisory recommendations are issued to inform the sponsor of the
inadvisability of the project from the standpoint of safety to personnel and
property."
b. In addition to
the above items, a DNH must also include or address:
1. Obstruction
standards exceeded.
2. Effect on VFR/IFR
aeronautical departure/arrival and en route operations, procedures, and minimum
flight altitudes.
3. Effect on
existing public-use airports and aeronautical facilities.
4. Effect on all
planned public-use airports and aeronautical facilities.
5. Cumulative
impact resulting from the proposed construction or alteration of a structure
when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures.
6. Information and
comments received as a result of circularization, informal airspace meetings,
and negotiations.
7. Reasons and basis for the determination that the structure will not be a
hazard to air navigation and any accommodations necessary by aeronautical users
or sponsors.
8. Consideration
given to any valid aeronautical comments received during the aeronautical study.
The official FAA determination must be a composite of the comments and findings
received from other interested FAA offices.
9. Conditions of
the determination including recommendations for marking and/or lighting of a
structure, changes in procedures and/or altitudes that are necessary to
accommodate the structure. The “conditions" should include a statement that
appropriate action will be taken to amend the effected procedure(s) and/or
altitude(s) upon notification to the FAA by the sponsor prior to the start of
construction or alteration.
10. Limitations,
if any.
11. Petitioning
information regardless of whether the structure is proposed or existing using
the following specific language: “This determination is subject to review if an
interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA (30 days from
issued date). In the event a petition for review is filed, it must contain a
full statement of the basis upon which it is made and be submitted to the
Manager, Airspace Regulations and ATC Procedures Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591. This
determination becomes final on [40 days from issued date] unless a petition is
timely filed. In which case, this determination will not become final pending
disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of
any review."
c. A DOH must
include or address:
1. FULL
DESCRIPTION. A full description of the structure, project, proposal, etc.
including all submitted frequencies and ERP must be included. Use exact
information to clearly identify the nature of the project. Use wording, such as
microwave antenna tower, FM or AM antenna tower, suspension bridge, TV antenna
tower, or four-stack power plant.
2. LATITUDE,
LONGITUDE, AND HEIGHT. Specify the latitude, longitude, and height(s) of each
structure. When an obstruction evaluation study concerns an array of antennas or
other multiple-type structures, specific information on each structure should be
included.
3. BASIS FOR THE
DETERMINATION. The reasons and basis for the determination must include the
adverse effect of the proposal upon the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace by aircraft and upon air navigation facilities. Also, state the reasons
the affected aeronautical operations or the procedure cannot be adjusted to
alleviate or eliminate the conflicting demands for the airspace. As a minimum,
the determination must address the following:
(a) Obstruction
standards exceeded.
(b) The effect on
VFR/IFR aeronautical departure/arrival and en route operations, procedures, and
the minimum flight altitudes effect on existing public-use airports and
aeronautical facilities.
(c) The effect on
all planned public-use airports and aeronautical facilities on file with the FAA
or for which the FAA has received adequate notice.
(d) The cumulative
impact resulting from the proposed construction or alteration of a structure
when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures.
(e) Information
and comments received as a result of circularization, informal airspace meetings
and negotiations.
(f) Reasons and
basis for the determination as to why the structure would be a hazard to air
navigation (e.g., a clear showing of substantial adverse effect).
4. PETITIONING
INFORMATION - Include petitioning information regardless of whether the
structure is proposed or existing using the following specific language: “This
determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition on or
before [30 days from issued date]. In the event a petition for review is filed,
it must contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is made and be
submitted to the Manager, Airspace Regulations and ATC Procedures Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591. This
determination becomes final on [40 days from issued date] unless a petition is
timely filed. The determination will not become final pending disposition of the
petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review."
7-1-5. DETERMINATION DATES
a. ISSUED DATE -
The issuance date of a determination is the date the determination is
distributed.
b. PETITION
DEADLINE - For determinations that involve petition rights, the deadline for
receipt of petition must be 30 days from the date of issuance.
c. EFFECTIVE DATE
-
1. The effective
date of determinations that do not involve petition rights must be the date of
issuance.
2. The effective
date of determinations that involve petition rights, whether for existing or
proposed structures, must be 40 days from the date of issuance provided a
petition for review is not filed. If a petition for review is filed, the
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition.
NOTE-
The effective date and the issued date may or may not be the same. The effective
date may also be referred to as the final date.
7-1-6. EXISTING
STRUCTURES
A determination issued as
a result of the study of an existing structure may be written in the following
forms:
a. As a DOH or DNH.
b. As a formal
letter outlining the effects of the structure and perhaps recommending to the
sponsor that the structure be marked and/or lighted, specifying that it be
reduced in height, or specifying that it be removed.
c. As an informal
letter or staff study making an internal FAA recommendation.
d. As a formal
letter to the FCC recommending the dismantling of an abandoned tower.
7-1-7. DISTRIBUTION OF
DETERMINATIONS
A record of the
distribution for each determination whether original, revised, extended, or
affirmed must be maintained in the aeronautical study file. When appropriate, a
reference to the distribution code, a mailing list, or any other evidence of
distribution will be sufficient.
a. Copies of all
determinations must be sent to the:
1. Sponsor (with
FAA Form 7460-2 as necessary)
2. Sponsor's
representative (if any).
3. FCC (if the
structure is subject to its licensing authority).
4. AeroNav in lieu
of FAA Form 7460-2 (if the structure is existing and does not involve a proposed
physical alteration). Copies of the determination must always be accompanied by
a copy of the submitted map and, if applicable, a copy of the survey; or if the
determination involves a change to marking and/or lighting of an existing
structure for which the sponsor has been requested to notify AeroNav directly of
the change.
5. Copies of the
determination must always be accompanied by a copy of the submitted map and, if
applicable, a copy of the surveys.
6. Other persons,
offices, or entities as deemed necessary or as requested.
b. In addition to
the above distribution, copies of a DNH and DOH must also be sent to:
1. AeroNav.
2. Military
representatives.
3. All other
interested persons.
|