Appendix 7. FAA/DOD Memorandum
of Understanding
MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Concerning
Environmental Review of Special Use
Airspace Actions
I. Purpose and
Scope.
The purpose of
this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
is to describe the guidelines for
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and the
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508)
without unnecessary duplication of
effort by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) and the
Department of Defense (DOD). This
MOU promotes early coordination
between FAA and DOD during the
environmental review process
associated with the establishment,
designation, and modification of
Special Use Airspace (SUA); permits
the application of “lead agency“ and
“cooperating agency" procedures to
environmental assessments (EA) and
findings of no significant impact as
well as to environmental impact
statements (EIS); and provides for
the issuance of environmental
documents for the development,
designation, modification, and use
of SUA.
II.
Definitions.
The definitions
contained in the CEQ Regulations (40
CFR Parts 1500-1508), FAA Orders,
and relevant DOD and/or Service
guidance are applicable to this MOU.
III.
Designation of Lead and Cooperating
Agency.
A.
Introduction: The actions taken
by DOD and FAA in the establishment,
designation, or modification of SUA
are subject to environmental impact
evaluation pursuant to NEPA, as
implemented by the CEQ regulations.
The CEQ regulations encourage a lead
agency be designated where related
actions by several Federal agencies
are involved.
The lead agency,
in such instances, is responsible
for consultation with other
agencies, for coordination of
appropriate environmental studies
and evaluations, and for preparation
of any NEPA-related determinations
or documents in cooperation with
other Federal agencies. Each agency
recognizes the need to eliminate
duplication. The cooperating agency
assumes responsibility to
independently review the
environmental documents prepared by
the lead agency and to assess
whether the environmental documents
meet the standards for adequacy
under NEPA.
The DOD and the
FAA will ensure appropriate
consideration of all actions and
impacts, including cumulative
impacts. The resultant environmental
documents of the lead agency are
accepted and used in decisions and
planning by all agencies involved
with the proposed action.
B. Designation
of lead agency. When the DOD
proposes that the FAA establish,
designate, or modify SUA, the DOD
shall serve as the lead agency for
the evaluation of environmental
impacts and the preparation and
processing of environmental
documents. However, when the FAA
proposes the establishment,
designation, or modification of SUA
affecting DOD, the FAA shall serve
as the lead agency for the
evaluation of environmental impacts
and the preparation and processing
of environmental documents.
C. Designation
of cooperating agency. When the
DOD proposes that the FAA establish,
designate, or modify SUA, the FAA
shall act as a cooperating agency
for the evaluation of environmental
impacts. However, when the FAA
proposes the establishment,
designation, or modification of SUA
affecting DOD, the DOD shall act as
a cooperating agency for the
evaluation of environmental impacts.
IV. Level of
Environmental Documentation
A. General.
Environmental documentation will be
processed in accordance with
applicable FAA Orders, and DOD
and/or Service directives.
B. Categorical
Exclusions. Where the actions of
one agency are subject to a
categorical exclusion (CATEX), and
the actions of the other agency,
with respect to the same SUA
request, require an EA, the agency
requiring the EA will prepare the
appropriate environmental
documentation. The applicability of
a CATEX to parts of the actions of
one of the agencies will be noted in
the environmental document. The
background information in support of
CATEXs, identified by either DOD or
FAA, shall be forwarded to the
agency requiring preparation of the
EA and may be used by either agency,
as allowed by their respective
regulations/directives. When the
categorical exclusion of the
proponent is not listed in FAAO
1050.1E, Chapter 3, which would
require FAA to prepare the
environmental documentation; FAA
budget constraints may delay
processing and implementation of a
proponent's proposal.
V. General
Guidance
A. Scheduling.
Whenever an action under this MOU
requires cooperation or coordination
between the FAA and DOD, the two
agencies shall agree on a schedule
to ensure that required actions are
taken on a timely basis. Each agency
will notify the other of any
difficulty with meeting scheduled
deadlines or any need to revise the
schedule.
B. Resolution
of disagreements. If the FAA and
DOD fail to reach agreement at the
normal working level on any issue
relating to environmental processing
of SUA proposals, the matter will be
referred, in ascending order, as
outlined in the table below. At any
time, the FAA's Office of the Chief
Counsel and the Office of the
General Counsel of the Service
Department involved shall be
consulted for assistance with legal
issues.
Equivalent
Levels of Responsibility for
Resolution of Disagreements
|
FAA
Administrator |
Service
Secretary |
Vice
President, Mission Support
Services |
Policy Board
on Federal Aviation (PBFA)
Principal Member
|
Director,
System Operations & Safety
|
PBFA
Alternate Principal Member
|
Manager,
System Operations & Safety,
Environmental Programs
|
PBFA Working
Group Member
|
VI. Effective
Date. This MOU shall become
effective on the last signature date
below and shall remain in effect
until otherwise rescinded or
modified by both signatory parties.
If either party determines that it
is necessary to amend this MOU, the
other party shall be notified in
writing of the specific change(s)
desired, with proposed language and
the reason(s) for the amendment. The
proposed amendment shall become
effective upon written agreement of
both parties.
SIGNED: DATE:
October 4, 2005
Carl P.
McCullough
Michael A. Cirillo
Department of
Defense
Federal Aviation Administration
|