U.S.
Department of
Transportation Federal
Aviation Administration |
Air
Traffic |
|
|
Issue # 2001 - 7
December 2001
Return to Air Traffic
Publications Home Page
|
Radio and Interphone Communications
/*TER/
The National Transportation Safety Board has issued numerous safety
recommendations to the FAA since 1973 to prevent runway incursions and
other airport surface incidents. One such recommendation was for
controllers to speak at reasonable rates when communicating with all
flight crews, especially to those whose primary language is not English.
In response to this recommendation, in June 2000, the FAA issued a GENOT
to this effect. To maintain focus on this recommendation, we will
periodically publish reminders in the Air Traffic Bulletin for
controllers to speak at reasonable rates when communicating with all
flight crews. (ATP-120) Intersection Departures
/*T/
Clearing arrivals and departures: it is what tower controllers do all
day long. However rote the task becomes, controllers remain alert for
anything that might interrupt a routine operation: wind changes,
airspeed differences, spacing, response time of aircraft taxiing off of
or departing from a runway, vehicles operating near a runway, etc. Our focus here is on departures
from an intersection. They involve a high level of risk of conflict with
other aircraft, vehicles, or objects and should be handled with caution.
Here are a few factors that might cause that risk level to rise even
higher: ·
There are multiple intersections
used for departures on the same runway. ·
There are intersecting departure
runways in use, with intersection departures in use on one or more of
them. ·
Traffic density or complexity
increases. ·
Multiple frequencies are in use
by the same controller. ·
Low visibility conditions are a
factor. ·
Similar types of aircraft are
waiting to go at different intersections on a runway as well as full
length departures. Many controllers contend with
several of these risk factors at once on a daily basis! They learn to
use techniques and procedures that help to standardize their operation,
creating "routines" used when they authorize intersection
departures. The basic rule, in FAAO 7110.65,
Air Traffic Control, Paragraph 3-7-1d, Ground Traffic Movement,
instructs controllers to, "State the runway intersection when
authorizing an aircraft to taxi into position to hold or when clearing
an aircraft for takeoff from an intersection." PHRASEOLOGY- Your facility standard operating
procedures (SOP) may have additional guidance that spells out local
procedures to use when authorizing use of intersection departures. You
might also be using other personal techniques shared among your trainers
and co-workers that work well at your airport. No procedure can always
prevent errors from occurring. That is where basic controller skills are
key: ·
A good scan can catch the wrong
aircraft taxiing onto the runway at an intersection when you have just
authorized a full length departure to taxi into position and hold. ·
If using multiple frequencies,
consider combining them; if unable, you could separate them by listening
to one through your earpiece, and the other through a speaker. ·
If you use strips or
strip-holders, different ways of managing them can give you visual clues
of the arrival/departure sequence. For instance, tilt the strip for an
aircraft given taxi into position and hold (TIPH) instructions to one
side; tilt the strip for an aircraft given a landing clearance to the
other side. ·
If you use a pad to keep track
of your pattern, you can use a notation next to the aircraft callsign to
let you know at a glance which aircraft is at which intersection. ·
Write it down! If not a
requirement at your facility, consider having ground control (GC) mark
the departure intersection on the strip, or have GC advise local control
when an aircraft taxies to a nonstandard intersection for departure. ·
When pilots check in "ready
for departure," note their stated position on your strip or pad. If
you see several similar aircraft and the pilot does not provide his
position, ask him for it. ·
When similar aircraft types line
up at all your runway hold lines, be extra careful to watch which one
moves when you clear it! (If no one moves, check the other end of the
runway, or another runway. It happens.) ·
During low visibility
conditions, you can ask pilots for position reports as they taxi, if you
do not have airport surface detection equipment (ASDE). Remember, if it
is nighttime or you cannot see the departure intersection from the
tower, you cannot authorize departures to TIPH from that intersection (FAAO
7110.65, Paragraph 3-9-4f.). ·
Always be alert for the wrong
aircraft to take a clearance onto the runway when intersection
departures are in use. ·
Utilize whatever memory aids,
techniques, or devices you or your facility has. They can help trigger
your memory if a distraction takes your attention away from the runway
momentarily. ·
Pay attention to your controller
instinct and experience; you might detect that a taxiing pilot does not
seem familiar with the airport and prevent his/her wrong turn onto a
runway. ·
Scan, scan, SCAN! In June 2001, FAA issued the
following advisory circulars (AC) to provide guidelines to pilots for
the development and implementation of standard operating procedures for
conducting safe aircraft operations on the airport surface: ·
AC 91-73 for Parts 91 and 135
single-pilot operations. ·
AC 120-74 for Parts 121, 125,
and 135 flightcrews. These ACs suggest to pilots that
as much attention should be given to the planning of the airport surface
movement portion of the flight as is given to the planning of other
phases of flight. In these ACs, situational
awareness is heavily emphasized; pilots are advised that they can help
controllers by maintaining awareness of their position, listening
intently for instructions, and reading back control instructions to
avoid confusion. Pilots are also advised to carry airport diagrams with
them to confirm taxi routes and help them remain aware of their position
while on the movement areas. ACs are "advisory
only," however. The main burden remains on the controller to
correctly identify a departure's position on the field. Use all the
tools and techniques you have available to positively identify aircraft
poised at your intersections. (ATP-120) Who're You Gonna Call? Ghostbusters?
/*TE/
Terminal facilities should coordinate with their appropriate ARTCC
traffic management unit (TMU) ensuring they are kept aware of situations
and conditions that may require the implementation of traffic management
(TM) initiatives. Immediately notify the ARTCC TMU when arrival,
departure, or tower en route delays are expected to reach 15 minutes. As
a minimum, include the projected delay and number of aircraft expected
to encounter delays. Additional changes of delay time should be reported
in 15-minute increments, continuing until delays are reported as less
than 15 minutes. Again, it is important to include the projected delay,
the number of aircraft currently encountering delays, and the number of
aircraft expected to encounter delays. Towers that are not collocated
with a terminal radar approach control facility (TRACON) TMU shall
coordinate with the appropriate TRACON TMU where the TM function has
been established. Unusual circumstances or
significant issues do not preclude the terminal TMU from contacting the
ATCSCC directly. In this case, the terminal TMU shall ask the ATCSCC to
conference the appropriate ARTCC TMU, and if necessary other affected
terminals, and user organizations concerning the development and
implementation of traffic management procedures. In addition, facility
managers shall ensure internal procedures are developed to notify the
ATCSCC and Facility Manager (Management) when delays exceed 90 minutes,
except for EDCT delays created by GDPs. The ARTCC shall be the focal
point for coordinating with the ATCSCC concerning any TM issues,
initiatives, programs, or information. Data received from terminal
facilities shall be passed to the ATCSCC in a timely manner. For more
information see Vectors
Below Minimum Vectoring
|
EFFECTIVE
DATE |
TEXTUAL
DP'S INST
APPROACH PROC |
EN
ROUTE MTR PREF RTS ARTCC BND |
GRAPHIC
DP'S STARS |
SIAP
TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
||
CUTOFF
FOR SUBMISSION |
.26
MSG (PROP IAP) |
NUMBER |
DATE |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 Dec 01 |
18
Oct 01 |
26
Nov 01 |
25
Oct 01 |
18
Oct 01 |
01-25 |
9
Nov 01 |
* 24 Jan 02 |
15
Nov 01 |
24
Dec 01 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-01 |
7
Dec 01 |
21 Feb 02 |
13
Dec 01 |
18
Jan 02 |
20
Dec 01 |
13
Dec 01 |
02-03 |
4
Jan 02 |
* 21 Mar 02 |
10
Jan 02 |
15
Feb 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-05 |
1
Feb 02 |
18 Apr 02 |
7
Feb 02 |
18
Mar 02 |
14
Feb 02 |
7
Feb 02 |
02-07 |
1
Mar 02 |
* 16 May 02 |
7
Mar 02 |
15
Apr 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-09 |
29
Mar 02 |
13 Jun 02 |
4
Apr 02 |
13
May 02 |
11
Apr 02 |
4
Apr 02 |
02-11 |
26
Apr 02 |
* 11 Jul 02 |
2
May 02 |
10
Jun 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-13 |
24
May 02 |
8 Aug 02 |
30
May 02 |
8
Jul 02 |
6
Jun 02 |
2
May 02 |
02-15 |
21
Jun 02 |
* 5 Sep 02 |
27
Jun 02 |
5
Aug 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-17 |
14
Jul 02 |
3 Oct 02 |
25
Jul 02 |
30
Aug 02 |
1
Aug 02 |
25
Jul 02 |
02-19 |
16
Aug 02 |
* 31 Oct 02 |
22
Aug 02 |
30
Sep 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-21 |
13
Sep 02 |
28 Nov 02 |
19
Sep 02 |
28
Oct 02 |
26
Sep 02 |
19
Sep 02 |
02-23 |
11
Oct 02 |
* 26 Dec 02 |
17
Oct 02 |
25
Nov 02 |
N/A |
N/A |
02-25 |
8
Nov 02 |
* Denotes Change Notice (CN). NOTE:
There is no CN for Alaskan procedures.