375
|
PRECISION APPROACH CRITICAL AREA
|
BG5
|
457
|
ALTITUDE INFORMATION
|
BG7
|
531
|
APPLICATION
|
BG8
|
551
|
APPLICATION
|
BG8
|
5513
|
GPA 102/103 CORRECTION FACTOR
|
BG9
|
599
|
SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT CLOSE PARALLEL
APPROACHES - HIGH UPDATE RADAR NOT REQUIRED
|
BG10
|
794
|
SEPARATION
|
BG10
|
841
|
APPLICATION
|
BG11
|
855
|
RADAR INDENTIFICATION APPLICATION
|
BG12
|
873
|
LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
BG13
|
874
|
LATERAL SEPARATION
|
BG15
|
883
|
LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
BG13
|
884
|
LATERAL SEPARATION
|
BG15
|
1051
|
NAVY FLEET SUPPORT MISSIONS
|
BG16
|
1322
|
CONFLICT DETECTION AND RESOLUTION
|
BG17
|
1324
|
CONTROLLER PILOT DATA LINK COMMUNICATIONS
(CPDLC)
|
BG17
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 211. ATC SERVICE
2. BACKGROUND: One of the hallmark core values of the air traffic control system is to provide a safe,
orderly, and expeditious flow of traffic. The workforce has requested the change to the classification of ATC
Service within this paragraph to reflect the core values of the controller.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
211. ATC SERVICE
|
|
211. ATC SERVICE
|
The primary purpose of the ATC system is to
prevent a collision between aircraft operating in the
system and to organize and expedite the flow of
traffic, and to provide support for National Security
and Homeland Defense. In addition to its primary
function, the ATC system has the capability to
provide (with certain limitations) additional
services. The ability to provide additional services
is limited by many factors, such as the volume of
traffic, frequency congestion, quality of radar,
controller workload, higher priority duties, and the
pure physical inability to scan and detect those
situations that fall in this category. It is recognized
that these services cannot be provided in cases in
which the provision of services is precluded by the
above factors. Consistent with the aforementioned
conditions, controllers must provide additional
service procedures to the extent permitted by higher
priority duties and other circumstances. The
provision of additional services is not optional on
the part of the controller, but rather is required when
the work situation permits. Provide air traffic
control service in accordance with the procedures
and minima in this order except when:
|
|
The primary purpose of the ATC system is to
prevent a collision between aircraft operating in the
system and to provide a safe, orderly and
expeditious flow of traffic, and to provide support
for National Security and Homeland Defense. In
addition to its primary function, the ATC system has
the capability to provide, with certain limitations,
additional services. The ability to provide
additional services is limited by many factors, such
as the volume of traffic, frequency congestion,
quality of radar, controller workload, higher
priority duties, and the pure physical inability to
scan and detect those situations that fall in this
category. It is recognized that these services cannot
be provided in cases in which the provision of
services is precluded by the above factors.
Consistent with the aforementioned conditions,
controllers must provide additional service
procedures to the extent permitted by higher
priority duties and other circumstances. The
provision of additional services is not optional on
the part of the controller, but rather is required when
the work situation permits. Provide air traffic
control service in accordance with the procedures
and minima in this order except when:
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 2117. RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
2. BACKGROUND: Effective communication is a principal tenet of ATC. When transferring radio
communications within a facility, or from one facility to another facility, issuance of the facility name is not
required in up/down facilities. However, for those facilities that are not colocated or do not share the same name
(for example, IAD ATCT and PCT TRACON), the name of the facility is required to be issued unless otherwise
described in a facility directive.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
2117. RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
2117. RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
|
Title through
b
|
|
No Change
|
1.
The facility name or location name and
terminal function to be contacted. TERMINAL:
Omit the location name when transferring
communications to another controller within your
facility; except when instructing the aircraft to
change frequency for final approach guidance
include the name of the facility.
|
|
1.
The facility name or location name and
terminal function to be contacted. TERMINAL:
Omit the location name when transferring
communications to another controller within your
facility, or, when the tower and TRACON share
the same name (for example, Phoenix Tower and
Phoenix TRACON).
|
Add
|
|
EXCEPTION.
Controllers must include the
name of the facility when instructing an aircraft
to change frequency for final approach
guidance.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 2-1-20.
WAKE TURBULENCE CAUTIONARY ADVISORIES
2. BACKGROUND: In 2013, Terminal Procedures was informed of a discrepancy concerning the application
of Wake Turbulence Cautionary Advisories (WTCA) when IFR aircraft accept a visual approach clearance or
visual separation and Heavy or B757 aircraft are involved. More specifically, controllers were issuing a WTCA
when a Heavy or B757 was the trailing aircraft. This is an incorrect application of the procedure.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
2-1-20.
WAKE TURBULENCE CAUTIONARY ADVISORIES
|
|
2-1-20.
WAKE TURBULENCE CAUTIONARY ADVISORIES
|
a.
Issue wake turbulence cautionary advisories
and the position, altitude if known, and direction of
flight of the heavy jet or B757 to:
|
|
a.
Issue wake turbulence cautionary advisories,
including the position, altitude if known, and
direction of flight to aircraft operating behind
Heavy or B757 aircraft to:
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 3420. RUNWAY STATUS LIGHTS (RWSL)
2. BACKGROUND: Through a collaborated effort to reduce runway incursions, the FAA tested and installed
runway status lights (RWSL) at selected airports throughout the United States. This system consists of runway
entrance lights (REL) and takeoff hold lights (THL) which provide pilots with an increased situational
awareness of when it is safe to enter/depart the runway.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
Add
|
|
3420.
RUNWAY STATUS LIGHTS (RWSL)
|
Add
|
|
TERMINAL
|
Add
|
|
RWSL is equipped with automatic intensity
settings and must be operated on a continuous
basis except under the following conditions:
|
Add
|
|
a.
If a pilot or vehicle report indicates any
portion of the RWSL system is on and is not able
to accept an ATC clearance; then
|
Add
|
|
1.
ATC must visually scan the entire runway.
If the runway is observed to be clear and the
lights are still illuminated, then the lights must
be turned off and clearance reissued.
|
Add
|
|
2.
If a portion of the runway is not visible from
the tower, ATC must visually scan the ASDEX.
If the runway is observed to be clear and the
lights are still illuminated, then the lights must
be turned off and clearance reissued.
|
Add
|
|
b.
When the RWSL Operational Status
displays “Lost Comm with System,” consider
the RWSL system out of service until checked
and confirmed to be operational by technical
operations personnel.
|
Add
|
|
c.
Once RWSL systems are turned off, they
must remain off until returned to service by
technical operations personnel.
|
Add
|
|
d.
Upon pilot request, adjust the light intensity.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 372. TAXI AND GROUND MOVEMENT OPERATIONS
2. BACKGROUND: In order to ensure that approach hold areas are consistently identified and appropriate
facilitylevel procedures are implemented for current approach hold applications, the Office of Runway Safety is
proposing this DCP for FAA Order JO 7210.3, Facility Operations and Administration, Paragraph 2120.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
372. TAXI AND GROUND MOVEMENT
OPERATIONS
|
|
372. TAXI AND GROUND MOVEMENTS
OPERATIONS
|
Title through
h
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
i.
Issue instructions to aircraft/vehicle to hold
short of an approach hold area.
|
Add
|
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
HOLD SHORT OF (runway) APPROACH
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 375. PRECISION APPROACH CRITICAL AREA
2. BACKGROUND: Numerous questions have been asked with regard to protection of the localizer critical
area when it refers to a middle marker. At multiple locations the middle marker has been decommissioned. In an
effort to provide guidance for these locations, a distance from the runway end is being added/substituted to
represent the approximate distance where the middle marker was previously located. In addition, operators
regularly conduct “AUTOLAND” or “COUPLED” approaches to satisfy maintenance, training, or reliability
requirements when weather conditions are better than the required minimum specified for protecting the critical
area (ceiling less than 800 feet or visibility less than 2 miles). Airline representatives requested, through the Air
Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee (ATPAC), that the critical areas be protected for all aircraft conducting
“autoland” approaches regardless of the weather. ATPAC and Terminal Procedures did not concur and informed
the airline representatives that procedures and phraseology already exists for controllers to an advise pilots
conducting “autoland” and “coupled” approaches that the critical area is not protected.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
375. PRECISION APPROACH CRITICAL
AREA
|
|
375. PRECISION APPROACH CRITICAL
AREA
|
a. ILS critical area dimensions are described in
FAAO 6750.16, Siting Criteria for Instrument
Landing Systems. Aircraft and vehicle access to the
ILS/MLS critical area must be controlled to ensure
the integrity of ILS/MLS course signals whenever
conditions are less than reported ceiling 800 feet or
visibility less than 2 miles. Do not authorize
vehicles/aircraft to operate in or over the critical
area, except as specified in
subpara a1, whenever an
arriving aircraft is inside the ILS outer marker (OM)
or the fix used in lieu of the OM unless the arriving
aircraft has reported the runway in sight or is
circling to land on another runway.
|
|
a. ILS critical area dimensions are described in FAA
Order 6750.16, Siting Criteria for Instrument
Landing Systems. Aircraft and vehicle access to the
ILS critical area must be controlled to ensure the
integrity of ILS course signals whenever conditions
are less than reported ceiling 800 feet or visibility
less than 2 miles. Do not authorize vehicles/aircraft
to operate in or over the critical area, except as
specified in subparagraph a1,
whenever an arriving aircraft is inside the ILS outer
marker (OM) or the fix used in lieu of the OM unless
the arriving aircraft has reported the runway in sight
or is circling to land on another runway.
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
HOLD SHORT OF (runway) ILS/MLS CRITICAL AREA.
|
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
HOLD SHORT OF (runway) ILS CRITICAL AREA.
|
1. LOCALIZER CRICITAL AREA
|
|
1. LOCALIZER CRICITAL AREA
|
a1 through
a1(a)(2)
|
|
No Change
|
(b) In addition to subpara
a1(a), do not authorize
vehicles or aircraft operations in or over the area
when an arriving aircraft is inside the middle
marker when conditions are less than reported
ceiling 200 feet or RVR 2,000 feet.
|
|
(b) In addition to
subparagraph
a1(a),
when
conditions are less than reported ceiling 200 feet
or RVR 2,000 feet, do not authorize vehicles or
aircraft operations in or over the area when an
arriving aircraft is inside the middle marker, or in
the absence of a middle marker, ½ mile final.
|
a2
|
|
No Change
|
b.
Air carriers commonly conduct “coupled” or
“autoland” operations to satisfy maintenance,
training, or reliability program requirements.
Promptly issue an advisory if the critical area will
not be protected when an arriving aircraft advises
that a “coupled,” “CATIII,” “autoland,” or similar
type approach will be conducted and the weather is
reported ceiling of 800 feet or more, and the
visibility is 2 miles or more.
|
|
b.
Operators commonly conduct “coupled” or
“autoland” approaches to satisfy maintenance,
training, or reliability program requirements.
Promptly issue an advisory if the critical area will
not be protected when an arriving aircraft advises
that a “coupled,” “CATIII,” “autoland,” or similar
type approach will be conducted and the weather indicates a reported ceiling of 800 feet or more,
or
the visibility is 2 miles or more.
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
ILS/MLS CRITICAL AREA NOT PROTECTED.
|
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
ILS CRITICAL AREA NOT PROTECTED.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 457. ALTITUDE INFORMATION
2. BACKGROUND: Current regulations require the issuance of a time check under most conditions when
issuing restrictions based on a Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) clock. The proposed change allows the use of
a clearance based on a time interval (in whole minutes) that a radar controller can use to expedite a climb or
descent where a standard rate may not be appropriate. As the proposed change is not based on UTC, but a time
interval, the issuance of a time check is not needed. The proposed change is not meant to be used in lieu of a
clearance based on UTC to ensure any timebased separation minima.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
457 ALTITUDE INFORMATION
|
|
457 ALTITUDE INFORMATION
|
Title thru
b
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
EXCEPTION. If you are in direct, twoway,
VHF/UHF voice communication with the pilot
and the aircraft is in radar contact, you may
specify an elapsed time interval restriction, in full
minute increments only, without any reference to
the UTC clock. The time restriction begins once
the clearance has been acknowledged by the pilot.
|
EXAMPLE-
1.
“United Four Seventeen, climb to reach one three
thousand at two two one five.”
“Time two two one one and onequarter.”
The pilot is expected to be level at 13,000 feet at 2215
UTC.
2. Through Relay“Speedbird Five, climb to reach flight
level threefive zero at onetwoonefive, time” (Issue a
time check).
|
|
EXAMPLE-
1. “United Four Seventeen, climb to reach one three
thousand at two two one five.”
“Time two two one one and onequarter.”
The pilot is expected to be level at 13,000 feet at 2215
UTC.
2. Through Relay“Speedbird Five, climb to reach flight
level threefive zero at onetwoonefive, time” (Issue a
time check).
|
Add
|
|
3.
In radar contact and in direct controller to pilot,
twoway, VHF/UHF voice communication “United
Four Seventeen, descend to reach flight level three five
zero within two minutes.” The time restriction begins
once the clearance has been acknowledged by the pilot.
|
Add
|
|
4.
“United Four Seventeen climb to leave flight level
three three zero within two minutes, maintain flight
level three five zero.”
|
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 1-2-1, Word Meanings.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 2-4-17, Numbers Usage.
|
|
No Change
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
CLIMB/DESCEND AND MAINTAIN (altitude).
If required,
AFTER PASSING (fix, waypoint),
or
AT (time) (time in hours, minutes, and nearest quarter
minute).
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH (altitude)
AT (time (issue time check) or fix, waypoint),
or
AT (time). CLIMB/DESCEND AND MAINTAIN
(altitude) WHEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST (number of
miles or minutes) MILES/MINUTES PAST (fix,
waypoint) ON THE (NAVAID) (specified) RADIAL.
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH (altitude) AT (time or
fix, waypoint),
or
A POINT (number of miles) MILES (direction) OF (name
of DME NAVAID),
or
MAINTAIN (altitude) UNTIL (time (issue time check),
fix, waypoint), THEN CLIMB/DESCEND AND
MAINTAIN(altitude).
Through relay:
CLIMB TO REACH (altitude) AT (time) (issue a time
check).
|
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
CLIMB/DESCEND AND MAINTAIN (altitude).
If required,
AFTER PASSING (fix, waypoint),
or
AT (time) (time in hours, minutes, and nearest quarter
minute).
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH (altitude)
AT (time (issue time check) or fix, waypoint),
or
AT (time). CLIMB/DESCEND AND MAINTAIN
(altitude) WHEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST (number of
miles or minutes) MILES/MINUTES PAST (fix,
waypoint) ON THE (NAVAID) (specified) RADIAL.
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH (altitude) AT (time or
fix, waypoint),
or
A POINT (number of miles) MILES (direction) OF (name
of DME NAVAID),
or
MAINTAIN (altitude) UNTIL (time (issue time check),
fix, waypoint), THEN CLIMB/DESCEND AND
MAINTAIN(altitude).
Through relay:
CLIMB TO REACH (altitude) AT (time) (issue a time
check).
|
Add
|
|
or
Using a time interval while in radar contact and in direct
controller to pilot, twoway, VHF/UHF voice
communication:
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH/LEAVE (altitude)
WITHIN (number) MINUTES, MAINTAIN (altitude).
or
CLIMB/DESCEND TO REACH/LEAVE (altitude) IN
(number) MINUTES OR LESS, MAINTAIN (altitude).
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
531. APPLICATION
551. APPLICATION
2. BACKGROUND: Paragraphs 531 and 551 currently require controllers to establish and maintain radar
identification of aircraft involved before providing radar service, except as provided in specific instances. This
change adds a reference to new Paragraph 855 that allows when radar separation may be provided. This
guidance implements the provisions of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Procedures for Air
Navigation ServicesAir traffic Management (PANSATM) Doc 4444, Paragraph 8.7.2.8.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
531 APPLICATION
|
|
531 APPLICATION
|
Before you provide radar service, establish and
maintain radar identification on the aircraft
involved, except as provided in para 551,
Application, subparas b2 and 3.
|
|
Before you provide radar service, establish and
maintain radar identification of the aircraft
involved, except as provided in Paragraph 551,
Application, subparagraphs b2, b3 and in
Paragraph 855, Radar Identification
Application.
|
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 319, Use of Tower Radar Displays.
|
|
REFERENCE-
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 319, Use of Tower Radar Displays.
FAAO JO 7110.65, Para 511, Presentation and Equipment
Performance.
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
551. APPLICATION
|
|
551. APPLICATION
|
Title through
b3
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
4.
A radaridentified aircraft and one not
radaridentified that is in transit from oceanic
airspace or nonradar offshore airspace into an
area of known radar coverage where radar
separation is applied as specified in
Paragraph 855, Radar Identification
Application, until the transiting aircraft is
radaridentified or the controller establishes
other approved separation in the event of a delay
or inability to establish radar identification of
the transiting aircraft.
|
Add
|
|
REFERENCE-
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 226, IFR Flight Progress Data. FAA
Order JO 7110.65, Para 511, Presentation and Equipment
Performance.
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 531, Application.
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 818, Use of Control Estimates.
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 855, Radar Separation.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 5513. GPA 102/103 CORRECTION FACTOR
2. BACKGROUND: According to subject matter experts within the Terminal Surveillance Group and En
Route NAS Engineering, the need to continue publishing this GPA 102/103 modification procedure is not
necessary. This modification was removed in the late 1970's and early 1980's when Long Range Radars were
modified to provide digitized target reports.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
5513. GPA 102/103 CORRECTION
FACTOR
|
|
5513. GPA 102/103 CORRECTION
FACTOR
|
When using a radar display whose primary radar
video is processed by the GPA 102/103
modification to a jointuse radar system, apply the
following correction factors to the applicable
minima:
|
|
Delete
|
a.
If less than 40 miles from the antenna- add
1 mile.
|
|
Delete
|
b.
If 40 miles or more but not over 200 miles from
the antenna- add 3 miles.
|
|
Delete
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 599. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT CLOSE PARALLEL APPROACHES HIGH UPDATE RADAR NOT REQUIRED
2. BACKGROUND: Effective August 19, 2013, AFS report (DOTFAAAFS45069) limited closely spaced
parallel approaches to those airports with runway centerlines separated by a minimum of 3,600', and field
elevation less than 1,000' MSL. Following the implementation of this procedure, further fasttime simulation and
analysis of the operation was conducted by AFS personnel to determine if the field elevation requirement could
be amended and/or raised to allow this type of operation at more airports than originally specified.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
599. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT
CLOSE PARALLEL APPROACHES HIGH
UPDATE RADAR NOT REQUIRED
|
|
599. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPENDENT
CLOSE PARALLEL APPROACHES HIGH
UPDATE RADAR NOT REQUIRED
|
Title through
b1
|
|
No Change
|
2. Parallel runway centerlines are separated by
a minimum of 3,600 feet or more, and the airport
elevation is less than 1,02.00 feet MSL.
|
|
2. Parallel runway centerlines are separated by
a minimum of 3,600 feet or more, and the airport
elevation is less than 2,000 feet MSL.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 794. SEPARATION
2. BACKGROUND: The requirement for the V22 Osprey to be considered a fixedwing aircraft while
operating in Class B airspace was based on the need to avoid misinterpretation by controllers as to the application
of separation standards for a FixedWing or Helicopter/Rotorcraft. At the time of that decision, no safetyrelated
studies had been completed concerning the flying characteristics of the V22 Osprey. The V22 Osprey is
currently identified in JO 7110.65V, Appendix B. Aircraft Information, Helicopters/Rotorcrafts.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
794. SEPARATION
|
|
794. SEPARATION
|
Title thru
a
|
|
No Change
|
b. VFR aircraft must be separated from VFR/IFR
aircraft that weigh more than 19,000 pounds and
turbojets by no less than:
|
|
b. VFR
fixedwing aircraft must be separated
from VFR/IFR aircraft/ helicopter/rotorcraft that
weigh more than 19,000 pounds and turbojets by no
less than:
|
1. 1 1/2 miles separation, or
|
|
1. 1 1/2 miles separation, or
|
2. 500 feet vertical separation, or
|
|
2. 500 feet vertical separation, or
|
NOTE-
Apply the provisions of para 554 Minima, when wake
turbulence separation is required.
|
|
NOTE-
Apply the provisions of paragraph 554 Minima, when
wake turbulence separation is required.
|
3. Visual separation, as specified in para 721,
Visual Separation, para 742, Vectors for Visual
Approach, and para 767, Sequencing.
|
|
3. Visual separation, as specified in
paragraph
721, Visual Separation, paragraph 742,
Vectors for Visual Approach, and paragraph
767, Sequencing.
|
NOTE-
Issue wake turbulence cautionary advisories in
accordance with para 2120 Wake Turbulence
Cautionary Advisories.
|
|
NOTE-
Issue wake turbulence cautionary advisories in
accordance with paragraph 2120 Wake Turbulence
Cautionary Advisories.
|
c. For the application of Class Bravo airspace
separation requirements, the V22 Osprey must be
treated as a fixedwing aircraft. It is an SRS
Category II aircraft but weighs more than 19,000
pounds. The V22 Osprey must be separated from
VFR/IFR aircraft by minimum identified in
subparagraph b above.
|
|
c. For the application of Class Bravo airspace
separation requirements, the V22 Osprey must be
treated as a helicopter/rotorcraft.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 841. APPLICATION
2. BACKGROUND: The Operations Support Group (OSG) conducted an analysis of the proposed change and
concluded that it will not have any effect on the intent or application of the current required separation standards.
Further, the OSG envisions the change will enhance the FAA's ability to provide additional IFR services to the
offshore industry. Therefore, Houston ARTCC is proposing a change to FAA JO 7110.65, Paragraph 841. In
particular, removing the phrase “controlled by Houston ARTCC" from the second paragraph in order to facilitate
future expansion of the current Offshore Grid System into the Jacksonville ARTCC Gulf of Mexico Low
airspace.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
841.
APPLICATION
|
|
841.
APPLICATION
|
Separate aircraft by assigning different flight paths
whose widths or protected airspace do not overlap.
|
|
Separate aircraft by assigning different flight paths
whose widths or protected airspace do not overlap.
|
Within that portion of the Gulf of Mexico Low
Offshore airspace controlled by Houston ARTCC,
use 12 NM between aircraft whose flight paths are
defined by published Grid System waypoints.
|
|
Within that portion of the Gulf of Mexico Low
Offshore airspace, use 12 NM between aircraft
whose flight paths are defined by published Grid
System waypoints.
|
NOTE-
1. The Grid System is defined as those waypoints
contained within the Gulf of Mexico Low Offshore
airspace and published on the IFR Vertical Flight
Reference Chart.
2. Lateral separation minima is contained in:
Section 7, North Atlantic ICAO Region.
Section 8, Caribbean ICAO Region.
Section 9, Pacific ICAO Region.
Section 10, North American ICAO Region-
Arctic CTA.
|
|
No Change
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 855. RADAR IDENTIFICATION APPLICATION
2. BACKGROUND: Existing International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) guidance provides that air
traffic services providers may authorize the application of radar separation between a radaridentified aircraft and
another aircraft, not yet radaridentified, that will be transitioning from an area without radar coverage to an area
within which radar coverage is adequate and radar services are provided.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
Add
|
|
855, RADAR IDENTIFICATION
APPLICATION
|
Add
|
|
Radar separation standards may be applied
between radar identified aircraft and another
aircraft not yet identified that is in transit from
oceanic airspace or nonradar offshore airspace
into an area of known radar coverage where
radar separation is applied provided:
|
Add
|
|
a.
Direct radio communications is maintained
with one of the aircraft involved and there is an
ability to communicate with the other;
|
Add
|
|
b.
The transiting aircraft is RNAV equipped;
|
Add
|
|
c.
The performance of the radar/system is
adequate;
|
Add
|
|
REFERENCE-
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 511, Presentation and Equipment
Performance
|
Add
|
|
d.
Flight data on the aircraft that has not been
radar identified indicate that it is equipped with
a standard transponder and there is no known
information that the transponder is not
operating;
|
Add
|
|
e.
Radar separation standards are maintained
between the radar identified aircraft and any
other observed targets until the transitioning
aircraft is radar identified or nonradar
separation is established;
|
Add
|
|
f.
The facility has identified areas of known
radar coverage, incorporated those areas into
facility standard operating procedures (SOP),
and provided training to the controllers.
|
Add
|
|
g.
This procedure is also applicable to aircraft
in transit from oceanic airspace into Guam
Control Area (CTA), San Juan CTA and
Honolulu CTA radar coverage areas.
|
Add
|
|
h. EXCEPTION: This procedure is not
authorized if there is insufficient time for the
controller to establish other approved
separation in the event of a delay or inability to
establish radar identification of the transiting
aircraft taking into consideration factors such as
aircraft performance characteristics, type, and
speed; weather, traffic conditions; workload;
frequency congestion; etc.
|
Add
|
|
REFERENCE-
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 226,IFR Flight Progress Data,
Subpara226.b.
FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para818, use of Control Estimates
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
873. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
883. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
2. BACKGROUND: There is a need to add a provision to FAA Order JO 7110.65 for 50 nautical mile (NM)
longitudinal (D50) separation and 30 NM lateral/30 NM longitudinal (30/30) separation within the New York
Oceanic Flight Information Region (FIR).
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
873. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
|
873. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
Title through
c
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
d.
Minima based on distance using Automatic
Dependent Surveillance – Contract (ADSC):
|
Add
|
|
1.
Apply the minima as specified in TBL 871
between aircraft on the same track within
airspace designated for Required Navigation
Performance (RNP), provided:
|
Add
|
|
(a)
Direct controller/pilot communication via voice or
Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) is established, and
|
Add
|
|
(b)
The required ADSC periodic reports
are maintained and monitored by an automated
flight data processor (for example, Ocean21).
|
Add
TBL 871
ADSC Criteria
Minima
|
RNP
|
Maximum ADSC
Periodic Reporting
Interval
|
50 NM
|
10
|
27 minutes
|
50 NM
|
4
|
32 minutes
|
30 NM
|
4
|
10 minutes
|
Add
|
|
2.
Aircraft on reciprocal tracks may be
cleared to climb or descend to or through the
altitude(s) occupied by another aircraft
provided:
|
Add
|
|
(a)
An ADSC position report on at least one
of the aircraft has been received beyond the
passing point, and
|
Add
|
|
(b)
The aircraft have passed each other by
the applicable separation minimum.
|
Add
|
|
NOTE-
Ocean21 has been designed to check for the above
criteria prior to allowing the minima to be provided.
|
Add
|
|
3.
When an ADSC periodic or waypoint
change event report is overdue by 3 minutes, the
controller must take action to obtain an ADSC
report.
|
Add
|
|
4.
If no report is received within
6 minutes of
the time the original report was due, the
controller must take action to apply another
form of separation.
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
883. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
|
883. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
|
Title through
d NOTE
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
e.
Minima based on distance using Automatic
Dependent Surveillance – Contract (ADSC):
|
Add
|
|
1.
Apply the minima as specified in TBL 881
between aircraft on the same track within
airspace designated for Required Navigation
Performance (RNP), provided:
|
Add
|
|
(a)
Direct controller/pilot communication
via voice or Controller Pilot Data Link
Communications (CPDLC) is established, and
|
Add
|
|
(b)
The required ADSC periodic reports
are maintained and monitored by an automated
flight data processor (for example, Ocean21).
|
Add
TBL 881
ADSC Criteria
Minima
|
RNP
|
Maximum ADSC
Periodic Reporting
Interval
|
50 NM
|
10
|
27 minutes
|
50 NM
|
4
|
32 minutes
|
30 NM
|
4
|
10 minutes
|
Add
|
|
2.
Aircraft on reciprocal tracks may be
cleared to climb or descend to or through the
altitude(s) occupied by another aircraft
provided:
|
Add
|
|
(a)
An ADSC position report on at least one
of the aircraft has been received beyond the
passing point, and
|
Add
|
|
(b)
The aircraft have passed each other by
the applicable separation minimum.
|
Add
|
|
NOTE-
Ocean21 has been designed to check for the above
criteria prior to allowing the minima to be provided.
|
Add
|
|
3.
When an ADSC periodic or waypoint
change event report is overdue by 3 minutes, the
controller must take action to obtain an ADSC
report.
|
Add
|
|
4.
If no report is received within
6 minutes of
the time the original report was due, the
controller must take action to apply another
form of separation.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
874. LATERAL SEPARATION
884. LATERAL SEPARATION
2. BACKGROUND: Due to changes in separation requirements, a provision to FAA Order JO 7110.65 is
necessary to reflect a standard of 30 NM lateral separation within the New York Oceanic Flight Information
Region (FIR).
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
874. LATERAL SEPARATION
|
|
874. LATERAL SEPARATION
|
In accordance with Chapter 8, Offshore/Oceanic
Procedures, Section 4, Lateral Separation, apply
the following:
|
|
No Change
|
a.
50 NM between Required Navigation
Performance (RNP 4 or RNP 10) approved aircraft
which:
|
|
a.
30 NM to RNP4 approved aircraft operating
within airspace designated for RNP4 when
direct controller/pilot communications, via
voice or Controller Pilot Data Link
Communications (CPDLC), and the required
ADSC contracts are maintained and monitored
by an automated flight data processor (e.g.,
Ocean21).
|
a through
d
|
|
Renumber b through
e
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
884. LATERAL SEPARATION
|
|
884. LATERAL SEPARATION
|
In accordance with Chapter 8, Offshore/Oceanic
Procedures, Section 4, Lateral Separation, apply the
following:
|
|
No Change
|
a.
50 NM between Required Navigation
Performance (RNP 4 RNP 10 approved aircraft
which:
|
|
a.
30 NM to RNP4 approved aircraft operating
within airspace designated for RNP4 when
direct controller/pilot communications, via
voice or Controller Pilot Data Link
Communications (CPDLC), and the required
ADSC contracts are maintained and monitored
by an automated flight data processor (e.g.,
Ocean21).
|
a through
e
|
|
Renumber b through
f
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 1051. NAVY FLEET SUPPORT MISSIONS
2. BACKGROUND: The U.S. Navy was queried as to the accuracy of Paragraph 1051, Navy Fleet Support
Missions. Upon review, the U.S. Navy determined that all paragraphs in ATO Orders referencing Navy Fleet
Support Missions are outdated and obsolete. Therefore, Paragraph 1051 is being deleted.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
1051. NAVY FLEET SUPPORT MISSIONS
|
|
Delete
|
When you receive information concerning an
emergency to a U.S. Navy “Special Flight Number”
aircraft, do the following:
|
|
Delete
|
a.
Handle Navy Fleet Support Mission aircraft as
follows:
|
|
Delete
|
1.
EN ROUTE. Relay immediately, via collect
telephone call, all pertinent information to Fleet
Operations Control at Norfolk, Virginia, telephone
804-444-6602.
|
|
Delete
|
2.
TERMINAL. Inform the nearest center of all
the pertinent information.
|
|
Delete
|
b.
Relay the words “Special Flight Number”
followed by the number given as part of the routine
IFR flight information.
|
|
Delete
|
c.
Honor pilot requests for changes to route,
altitude, and destination, whenever possible.
|
|
Delete
|
10-5-2. EXPLOSIVE CARGO
|
|
Renumber 10-5-1. EXPLOSIVE CARGO
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 1322. CONFLICT DETECTION AND RESOLUTION
2. BACKGROUND: Chapter 13, Section 2, of the 7110.65 contains a list of Conflict Probe limitations
pertaining to the Ocean21 operating system including “Paragraph 863 Temporary Moving Airspace
Reservations.” Ocean21 functionality supports the application of lateral, longitudinal, and vertical separation to
temporary moving airspace reservations.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
1322. CONFLICT DETECTION AND
RESOLUTION
|
|
1322. CONFLICT DETECTION AND
RESOLUTION
|
Title through
a8(a)(8)
|
|
No Change
|
(9) Para 863Temporary Moving Airspace
Reservations
|
|
Delete
|
(10) Para 885VFR Climb and Descent
|
|
(9) Para 8-8-5 VFR Climb and Descent
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 1324. CONTROLLER PILOT DATA LINK
COMMUNICATIONS (CPDLC)
2. BACKGROUND: Guidance concerning unanswered CPDLC messages in FAA Order 7110.65 Paragraph
1324 advises controllers to assume all unanswered CPDLC messages have not been delivered. This guidance is
not in compliance with guidance prescribed in the ICAO Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD).
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
1324. CONTROLLER PILOT DATA LINK
COMMUNICATIONS (CPDLC)
|
|
1324. CONTROLLER PILOT DATA LINK
COMMUNICATIONS (CPDLC)
|
Title through
b4
|
|
No Change
|
5.
Assume that all unanswered CPDLC
messages have not been delivered. On initial voice
contact with aircraft preface the message with the
following:
|
|
5. When there is uncertainty that a clearance
was delivered to an aircraft via CPDLC, the
controller must continue to protect the airspace
associated with the clearance until an
appropriate operational response is received
from the flight crew. If an expected operational
response to a clearance is not received, the
controller will initiate appropriate action to
ensure that the clearance was received by the
flight crew. On initial voice contact with aircraft
preface the message with the following:
|
PHRASEOLOGY-
(Call Sign) CPDLC Failure, (message).
|
|
No Change
|
|