Table of Contents
Paragraph
Number
|
Title
|
Page
|
2-2-4
|
DUTY FAMILIARIZATION
|
BG-3
|
2-6-1
|
WATCH SUPERVISION
|
BG-3
|
2-6-7
|
BASIC WATCH
|
BG-4
|
2-9-6
|
VISIBILITY CHARTS
|
BG-4
|
3-7-3
|
DISPLAY MAP DATA
|
BG-5
|
3-8-2
|
MINIMUM VECTORING ALTITUDE CHARTS (MVAC)
PREPARATION
|
BG-7
|
6-9-1
|
GENERAL
|
BG-11
|
6-9-5
|
NON-RVSM REQUIREMENTS
|
BG-11
|
10-3-14
|
GO-AROUND/MISSED APPROACH
|
BG-5
|
10-4-9
|
SIMULTANEOUS CONVERGING INSTRUMENT APPROACHES
|
BG-12
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
224. DUTY FAMILIARIZATION AND THE TRANSFER OF POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
261. WATCH SUPERVISION
2. BACKGROUND: On December 11 and 12, 2013, the ATO convened a Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
development team. The team's purpose was to address the FY 2014 Top 5 hazards contributing to risk in the
National Airspace System. One of the hazards identified was pertinent elements of position relief briefings being
omitted. Another hazard identified was air traffic control specialists being distracted from priority tasks by
activities in the work area and/or other job related functions.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
224. DUTY FAMILIARIZATION AND THE
TRANSFER OF POSITION
RESPONSIBILITY
|
|
224. DUTY FAMILIARIZATION AND THE
TRANSFER OF POSITION
RESPONSIBILITY
|
Title through
b
|
|
No change
|
1. Review each sector or position and provide a
tailored checklist which lists the equipment and the
operational conditions which are likely to be a
factor at that position.
|
|
1.
Review each sector or position and provide a
tailored checklist which lists the equipment and the
operational conditions which are likely to be a
factor at that position. Checklists must be
reviewed annually to ensure the sector/position
checklist items are current.
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
261. WATCH SUPERVISION
|
|
261. WATCH SUPERVISION
|
Title through
Paragraph a10
|
|
No Change
|
11. Management of the operational environment
with a goal toward eliminating distractions.
|
|
11. Management of the operational environment
with a goal toward eliminating distractions of:
|
Add
|
|
(a)
Nonoperationallyrelated activities or
tasks that are distracting, such as controller
schedule or leave bidding.
|
Add
|
|
(b)
Nonoperationally needed items and
equipment.
|
Add
|
|
(c)
When activities or tasks that are not time
critical or operationally necessary become
distracting to the operation, watch supervision
must take steps to defer or relocate these
activities or tasks.
|
a12 through
b NOTE
|
|
No Change
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 267. BASIC WATCH SCHEDULE
2. BACKGROUND: The ATO Fatigue Safety Steering Committee (FSSC) established a work group to review
operational and procedural options, then identify and formulate criteria to use for longterm planning. The FSSC
work group (FAA management, NATCA, and PASS representatives) was supported by the ATO FRMT, fatigue
science expertise, and data analysis. The work group reviewed fatigue hazards associated with three types of
work schedules: 10hour midnight shifts, consecutive midnight shifts, and early days preceding midnight shifts.
The work group then developed mitigation recommendations to reduce identified fatigue hazards related to
midnight shift watch schedules.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
267. BASIC WATCH SCHEDULE
|
|
267. BASIC WATCH SCHEDULE
|
Title through b5
|
|
No change
|
6. Do not work more than six shifts without taking
a regular day off.
|
|
6. If an employee is assigned more than two
(2) consecutive ten (10) hour midnight shifts, all
of the consecutive ten (10) hour midnight shifts
require a 2100L (Non flex) start time.
|
7. Authorized leave, compensatory time used,
and credit hours used are considered hours of work.
|
|
7. Ten (10) hour midnight shifts are limited to
no more than four (4) in any six (6) day period.
|
8. These criteria apply to shift adjustments,
including the exchange of shifts and/or days off and
the change of shifts and/or days off.
|
|
8. No day shift may immediately precede a ten
(10) hour midnight shift.
|
Add
|
|
9. Eight (8) hour midnight shifts may be
extended by no more than one (1) hour per single
shift.
|
Add
|
|
10. A 0530L start time or later is required
when working an eight (8) hour day shift prior
to an eight (8) hour midnight shift. Employees
may not flex to an earlier start time than 0530L.
|
Add
|
|
11. Do not work more than six shifts without
taking a regular day off.
|
Add
|
|
12. Authorized leave, compensatory time
used, and credit hours used are considered hours
of work.
|
Add
|
|
13. These criteria apply to shift adjustments,
including the exchange of shifts and/or days off
and the change of shifts and/or days off.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 2-9-6. VISIBILITY CHARTS
2. BACKGROUND: Effective October 1, 2013, the National Weather Service (NWS) transferred the
responsibility for training oversight, certification, and facility inspection responsibilities for Limited Aviation
Weather Reporting Stations (LAWRS), Contract Weather Observers (CWO), and nonFederal Weather
Observers (NFOBS), to the FAA. The nonFederal Observers are those working under the guidelines of the FAA
NFOBS Program (FAA Order 7900.5, Appendix B). The FAA will assume responsibility for issuing and
tracking certifications for the specified weather observers, verifying that training and other weather observation
qualifications are met, and inspecting facilities where observations are performed by the specified weather
observers.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
2-9-6. VISIBILITY CHARTS
|
|
2-9-6. VISIBILITY CHARTS
|
Where facilities provide backup/augmentation of
automated weather observations, or manual
observations, the facility air traffic manager, in
conjunction with NWS personnel, must prepare and
maintain visibility charts in accordance with the
following:
|
|
a. Where facilities provide backup/augmentation
of automated weather observations, or manual
observations, the facility air traffic manager will
select a designee that will prepare and maintain
visibility charts in accordance with the following:
|
a. Prepare a chart(s) or list(s) for daytime and
nighttime visibility markers. At local discretion,
visibility markers may be depicted on separate
daytime and nighttime charts or on a
daytime/nighttime combination chart. Panoramic
photographs marked with distances and cardinal
compass points may also be used.
|
|
1. Prepare a chart(s) or list(s) for daytime and
nighttime visibility markers. At local discretion,
visibility markers may be depicted on separate
daytime and nighttime charts or on a
daytime/nighttime combination chart. Panoramic
photographs marked with distances and cardinal
compass points may also be used.
|
b. Daytime/Nighttime combination charts must
use the following legend for each marker:
|
|
2. Daytime/Nighttime combination charts must
use the following legend for each marker:
|
Graphic
|
|
No Change
|
c. Each marker used must be identified and its
distance from the observation point noted. Include
the height of the marker if it is for estimating heights
of clouds and obscuring phenomena.
|
|
3. Each marker used must be identified and its
distance from the observation point noted. Include
the height of the marker if it is for estimating heights
of clouds and obscuring phenomena.
|
Add
|
|
4. Mapping programs, aircraft/vehicles, GPS
and/or surveying equipment are all valid
methods to develop visibility charts.
|
Add
|
|
b. The air traffic manager must conduct an
annual review and approve the visibility charts,
lists, or photos to ensure their accuracy.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
373. DISPLAY MAP DATA
10314. GOAROUND/MISSSED APPROACH
2. BACKGROUND: A Corrective Action Request was developed identifying airports where aircraft
operating on nonintersecting converging runways were passing through the airborne intersection on the
extended centerline of the runway within 14 seconds of each other. Additionally, on July 1, 2013, the National
Transportation Safety Board issued Safety Recommendation A13024 identifying the same issue. The ATO
tasked Air Traffic Managers at those facilities that have non-intersecting converging runways where the
extended centerline of a runway crosses a converging runway or the extended centerline of a converging runway
within 1NM of either departure end to convene/complete a SRM panel to review these operations. The changes
were created by a work group at the direction of the Office of Safety and Technical Training (AJI). The changes
were incorporated via a Notice. The Notice was implemented at LAS, CLT, JFK, IAD, IAH, ORD, and BOS
beginning January 15, 2014. Secondly, the change was implemented at DFW, MSP, DEN, BWI, HNL, MEM,
MIA, PHL, SLC, and TPA beginning April 2, 2014. Lastly, the change was implemented at all additional affected
airports beginning July 9, 2014.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
373. DISPLAY MAP DATA
|
|
373. DISPLAY MAP DATA
|
Title through p
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
q. Virtual intersection markings for
nonintersecting converging runways if the
flight paths intersect within 1NM beyond the
departure end of both runways.
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
10314. GOAROUND/MISSSED
APPROACH
|
|
10314. GOAROUND/MISSSED
APPROACH
|
Title through REFERENCE
|
|
No change
|
NOTE-
Facilities with approved arrival/departure window
procedures are considered to be in compliance with the
provisions of this paragraph.
|
|
Delete
|
Add
|
|
b. Facility air traffic managers may develop
procedural mitigations for non-intersecting
converging runways when a 1 NM extension of
the runway centerline crosses the centerline of
the other runway or the 1 NM extensions of a
runway cross the extension of another runway.
Facility directives must:
|
Add
|
|
1. Specify procedures to ensure that an
arrival that executes a goaround does not
conflict with a departure off the
non-intersecting converging runway.
|
Add
|
|
2. Define technological tools that could assist
in the locally developed procedures.
|
Add
|
|
3. Specify procedures to be used when
conditions dictate that intersecting runway
separation standards must be applied.
|
Add
|
|
NOTE-
1. The locally developed procedure will ensure that the
potential go around aircraft will not conflict with a
departing aircraft that is departing the
non-intersecting converging runways. All locally
developed procedures will be approved by the Director
of Operations, Headquarters. ATMs will determine
what tools are needed in the development of local
procedures. These may include, but are not limited to:
|
Add
|
|
(a) Arrival Departure Window (ADW)
|
Add
|
|
(b) ASDEX Virtual Runway Intersection Point
(VRIP)
|
Add
|
|
(c) Cutoff Points (CP) developed with the use of
enhanced TARGETS.
|
Add
|
|
REFERENCE
FAAO 7110.65, Para 399, Non -intersecting Converging Runway
Operations.
|
b. The procedures must be evaluated on an annual
basis to determine their effectiveness.
|
|
c. The procedures must be evaluated on an annual
basis to determine their effectiveness.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 382. MINIMUM VECTORING ALTITUDE CHARTS
(MVAC) PREPARATION (TERMINAL/MEARTS)
2. BACKGROUND: The Flight Standards organization has revised Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS)
criteria concerning Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA) charts. The Flight Systems Lab, AFS450, has
completed a safety analysis that has resulted in an acceptable collision risk regarding the practice of rounding
resultant MVAs to the nearest 100foot increment, with some conditions. This coupled with the recent change in
the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR 91.177, Minimum IFR Altitudes, has permitted a return to this legacy
practice. Additionally, Aeronautical Navigation Services is undergoing a reorganization and being absorbed into
the new Mission Support Services organization, AJV. As a result, all references to Aero Nav Services are being
changed to reflect this reorganization.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
382. MINIMUM VECTORING ALTITUDE
CHARTS (MVAC) PREPARATION
(TERMINAL/MEARTS)
|
|
382. MINIMUM VECTORING ALTITUDE
CHARTS (MVAC) PREPARATION
(TERMINAL/MEARTS)
|
Prepare a vectoring chart in accordance with the
criteria contained in FAA Order 8260.3, United
States Standard for Terminal Instrument
Procedures (TERPS)
|
|
No Change
|
a. MVACs must be developed and maintained
using the Sector Design and Analysis Tool (SDAT).
Facility Managers may request assistance in the
development and maintenance of their MVAC or
request SDAT user support by soliciting the
Mission Support Services, Geographic Services
Group. MVACs developed in SDAT properly apply
obstruction clearance criteria required by FAA
Order 8260.3. SDAT completes FAA Form 72109
and automatically creates and sends the necessary
data files to Mission Support Services, ATC
Products Group upon certification.
|
|
a. MVACs must be developed and maintained
using the Sector Design and Analysis Tool (SDAT).
Facility Managers may request assistance in the
development and maintenance of their MVAC or
request SDAT user support by soliciting the
Mission Support Services, Geographic Services
Group. MVACs developed in SDAT properly apply
obstruction clearance criteria required by FAA
Order 8260.3. SDAT completes FAA Form 72109
and automatically creates and sends the necessary
data files to Mission Support Services, ATC
Products Group upon certification for subsequent
radar video map creation. Facility
correspondence to ATC Products regarding
MVACs and video maps must be accomplished
via email to 9AJVHQATCPRODUCTS.
|
NOTE through e6
|
|
No Change
|
7. ROC reductions should only be requested
when there is a demonstrated operational need, and
in no event will requested reductions result in an
MVA that does not comply with 14 CFR 91.177.
|
|
7. ROC reductions should only be requested
when there is a demonstrated operational need.
|
f. An assumed adverse obstacle (AAO) additive is
required in areas not designated as mountainous
(ROC 1,000 feet) and in designated mountainous
terrain areas when any ROC reduction is requested.
|
|
No Change
|
g. Where an operational need is demonstrated and
documented, managers are permitted to round a
resulting MVA with an AAO additive to the nearest
100foot increment, provided the minimum ROC is
maintained for other nonAAO obstacles; for
example, 3,049 feet rounds to 3,000 feet to support
glide slope intercept requirements.
|
|
g. Resultant MVAs may be rounded down to
the nearest 100foot increment (those that are
xx49 feet or less), except in the following cases:
|
Add
|
|
1. Any locations outside of the Contiguous
United States.
|
Add
|
|
2. Where any part of an MVA Sector is more
than 65 NM from the issued altimeter source.
|
Add
|
|
3. When all of the following conditions are
applicable:
|
Add
|
|
(a) the MVA Sector is within designated
mountainous areas by 14 CFR Part 95,
|
Add
|
|
(b) the terrain is deemed precipitous by
facility Air Traffic Management,
|
Add
|
|
(c) the previous 5 year average low
temperature at the primary airport is
documented to be less than the temperature
shown in Table 381 for the amount of ROC
reduction requested. Retain temperature
documentation locally with approved 72109.
Use Table 381 to determine the extent of
mountainous terrain reduction permitted if
rounding down, based on the average low
temperature. Comply with the following process
to determine the average low temperature.
|
Add
|
|
(1) Go to the National Climatic Data
Center web site at www.NCDC.noaa.gov
|
Add
|
|
(2) Click on “Data Access” link on blue
bar.
|
Add
|
|
(3) Click on “LandBased Stations” on left
column, then click “Climate Data Online.”
|
Add
|
|
(4) Click on “Search Tool” link.
|
Add
|
|
(5) On the Search form, select Annual
Summaries, and accept default fields, then enter
primary airport identifier.
|
Add
|
|
(6) Click on “Airport Name” on left side of
page.
|
Add
|
|
(7) Scroll to bottom of page and select the
year for review.
|
Add
|
|
(8) Select each relevant year, and
document the Lowest Temperature for the year.
This is the EMNT column, on the bottom row.
Then calculate the 5-year average.
|
Add
|
|
** Do not select Add to cart. All data is free if the
internet proxy is set to AWA or AMC.
|
Add
TBL 381
ROC Reduction/Temperature Table
Requested ROC
Reduction
|
Minimum Average Low
Temperature
|
100’
|
40°C/40°F
|
200’
|
35°C/31°F
|
300’
|
30°C/22°F
|
400’
|
25°C/13°F
|
500’
|
20°C/4°F
|
600’
|
15°C/5°F
|
700’
|
10°C/14°F
|
800’
|
5°C/23°F
|
900’
|
0°C/32°F
|
1000’
|
7°C/45°F(2°C/36°F when
MVA sector is within 35
NM of issued altimeter)
|
h. Managers requesting to waive criteria
contained in FAA Order 8260.3, must submit FAA
Form 82601, Flight Procedures/Standards Waiver
in conjunction with the MVA project. This waiver
form will contain the criteria requested to be
waived, with the operational need fully explained,
and examples of how the facility will achieve an
equivalent level of safety, if approved. The package
will be sent to the ATC Products Group through the
Service Center OSG. Upon completion of the ATC
Products Group review, the package will be
forwarded to the Flight Procedure Implementation
and Oversight Branch. For the Flight Standards
Waiver process, facility managers do not need to
complete a Safety Management System evaluation.
An electronic copy of the completed waiver
package must be sent to Terminal Safety and
Operations Support.
|
|
h. Managers requesting to waive criteria
contained in FAA Order 8260.3, must submit FAA
Form 82601, Flight Procedures/Standards Waiver
in conjunction with the MVA project. This waiver
form will contain the criteria requested to be
waived, with the operational need fully explained,
and examples of how the facility will achieve an
equivalent level of safety, if approved. The package
will be sent to the ATC Products Group through the
Service Center OSG. Upon completion of the ATC
Products Group review, the package will be
forwarded to the Flight Procedure Implementation
and Oversight Branch. For the Flight Standards
Waiver process, facility managers do not need to
complete a Safety Management System evaluation.
An electronic copy of the completed waiver
package must be sent to Operations
Headquarters Directorate, AJT2, at
9AJT2HQAirTrafficOperations.
|
i. MVAs must not be below the floor of controlled
airspace and should provide a 300-ft buffer above
the floor of controlled airspace. In some cases, this
application will result in an exceptionally high
MVA (for example, in areas where the floor of
controlled airspace is 14,500 MSL). When
operationally required to vector aircraft in
underlying Class G (uncontrolled) airspace, 2
MVAs may be established. The primary MVA must
be based on obstruction clearance and the floor of
controlled airspace. A second, lower MVA that
provides obstruction clearance only may be
established. The obstruction clearance MVA must
be uniquely identified; for example, by an asterisk
(*). Do not consider buffer areas for controlled
airspace evaluations.
|
|
No Change
|
j. If new charts prepared using SDAT create a
significant impact on a facility's operation, the
impact must be coordinated with ATO Terminal
Safety and Operations Support for joint
coordination with System Operations.
|
|
j. If new charts prepared using SDAT create a
significant impact on a facility's operation, the
impact must be coordinated with Operations
Headquarters Directorate, AJT2, for joint
coordination with System Operations.
|
Paragraph j NOTE through l
|
|
No Change
|
m. Each request must indicate the MVAC was
accomplished in SDAT and stored in the SDAT
repository.
|
|
m. Each request must indicate the MVAC was
accomplished in SDAT, stored in the SDAT
repository and when necessary, include a
statement regarding the issued altimeter settings
being within 65 NM of a rounded down sector
and/or provides the 5-year average cold
temperature.
|
n. Each request must include the SDAT generated
Form 72109 with the manager's signature and
point of contact at the submitting facility. Form
72109 must also be an electronic copy with the
manager's signature, and imported into the MVA
project file. When applicable, each Form 72109
must include explanations/justifications for both
ROC reduction and AAO additive rounding
requests. The MVA request with the 72109 may be
electronically forwarded to the OSG, but must be
followed with a hard copy with original signatures.
However, when the capability of electronic
signatures is developed within SDAT, Form 72109
may be transmitted electronically between the
facility, Service Center, and ATC Products Group in
lieu of the paper process. SDAT will automatically
store the approved MVAC package in the National
Airspace System Resource (NASR).
|
|
n. Each request must include the SDAT generated
Form 72109 with the manager's signature and
point of contact at the submitting facility. Form
72109 must also be an electronic copy with the
manager's signature, and imported into the MVA
project file. When applicable, each Form 72109
must include explanations/justifications for ROC
reduction requests. The MVA request with the
72109 will be electronically forwarded to the OSG.
When the capability of electronic signatures is
developed within SDAT, Form 72109 may be
transmitted electronically between the facility,
Service Center, and ATC Products Group in lieu of
the paper process. SDAT will automatically store
the approved MVAC package in the National
Airspace System Resource (NASR).
|
o. For those facilities that use the SDAT program
office for the development and maintenance of their
MVACs, the SDAT program office personnel must
be notified to complete the final submission step of
the project within the repository when sending the
MVAC request to the OSG.
|
|
o. All facilities must notify the SDAT program
office personnel to complete the final submission
step of the project within the repository when
sending the MVAC request to the OSG.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE:
691. GENERAL
695. NONRVSM REQUIREMENTS
2. BACKGROUND: FAA JO 7210.3, Paragraph 691, b1, Note 1, and Paragraph 695b define certain
excepted nonRVSM aircraft that may operate within RVSM airspace. Due to the duration of flight and distance
between appropriate landing facilities, provisions have been made to allow for additional exceptions within the
Oceanic and Offshore environment. In addition to those exceptions in said paragraphs, the following nonRVSM
aircraft may operate within RVSM airspace while operating within oceanic airspace or transitioning to/from
oceanic airspace: an aircraft being initially delivered to the State of Registry or Operator; an aircraft that was
formerly RVSM-approved but has experienced an equipment failure and is being flown to a maintenance facility
for repair in order to meet RVSM requirements and/or obtain approval; an aircraft being utilized for mercy or
humanitarian purposes; within the Oakland, Anchorage, and Arctic FIRs an aircraft transporting a spare engine
mounted under the wing.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
691. GENERAL
|
|
691. GENERAL
|
Title through b1 NOTE 1e
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
2. The following aircraft operating within oceanic
airspace or transiting to/from oceanic airspace are
excepted:
|
Add
|
|
a. Aircraft being initially delivered to the State of
Registry or Operator;
|
Add
|
|
b. Aircraft that was formerly RVSM approved but has
experienced an equipment failure and is being flown to
a maintenance facility for repair in order to meet RVSM
requirements and/or obtain approval;
|
Add
|
|
c. Aircraft being utilized for mercy or humanitarian
purposes;
|
Add
|
|
d. Within the Oakland, Anchorage, and Arctic FIRs,
an aircraft transporting a spare engine mounted under
the wing.
|
2. Aircraft not approved for RVSM operations may
transition through RVSM airspace to operate above or
below.
|
|
3. Aircraft not approved for RVSM operations may
transition through RVSM airspace to operate above or
below.
|
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
695. nonRVSM Requirements
|
|
695. nonRVSM Requirements
|
Title through b
|
|
No Change
|
Add
|
|
c. Within oceanic airspace or transiting
to/from oceanic airspace aircraft being initially
delivered to the State of Registry or Operator, an
aircraft that was formerly RVSM approved but
has experienced an equipment failure and is
being flown to a maintenance facility for repair
in order to meet RVSM requirements and/or
obtain approval; an aircraft being utilized for
mercy or humanitarian purposes; and within
the Oakland, Anchorage, and Arctic FIRs, an
aircraft transporting a spare engine mounted
under the wing will be accommodated in RVSM
airspace on a workload permitting basis.
|
c. Non-RVSM Exception Flights Inbound to U.S.
The TMU at the facility where an aircraft penetrates
RVSM airspace designated for U.S. air traffic
control, or entry facility, receives the coordination
from an international point-of-contact advising of
an inbound non-RVSM exception. The TMU must
coordinate with the operational supervisor/CIC in a
timely manner.
|
|
d. Non-RVSM Exception Flights Inbound to U.S.
The TMU at the facility where an aircraft penetrates
RVSM airspace designated for U.S. air traffic
control, or entry facility, receives the coordination
from an international point-of-contact advising of
an inbound non-RVSM exception. The TMU must
coordinate with the operational supervisor/CIC in a
timely manner.
|
1. PARAGRAPH NUMBER AND TITLE: 1049. SIMULTANEOUS CONVERGING INSTRUMENT
APPROACHES
2. BACKGROUND: FAA Order 7110.98A, Simultaneous Converging Instrument Approaches (SCIA), has
been in use since 1993 and was developed to provide a method of conducting converging approaches to
minimums less than a ceiling of 1,000 feet or visibility less than 3 miles. The order also contains the method of
identifying Converging ILS Approach procedures on approach plates. New generations of aircraft Flight
Management System (FMS) systems are being installed in aircraft. The newer FMS systems cannot accept the
current method of coding converging ILS approaches.
3. CHANGE:
OLD
|
|
NEW
|
Add
|
|
1049. SIMULTANEOUS CONVERGING
INSTRUMENT APPROACHES
|
Add
|
|
a. The procedures to conduct Simultaneous
Converging Instrument Approaches (SCIA)
must be developed in accordance with the
following paragraphs.
|
Add
|
|
1. The ATM must:
|
Add
|
|
(a) Determine that the volume and
complexity of aircraft operations requires the
use of simultaneous converging instrument
approaches. Additionally, no adverse impact on
the users or air traffic control facilities can result
from the implementation of the procedure.
|
Add
|
|
(b) Coordinate with airport operations to
ensure that runway intersection identification
markings are in accordance with appropriate
standards if the runways intersect.
|
Add
|
|
(c) Coordinate with the responsible Service
Area Flight Procedures Team (FPT) through the
service area Operations Support Group (OSG)
for the feasibility of SCIA procedural design and
the ability to achieve minimums sufficient to
justify procedural development. The FPT must
consider all aspects of the approach, including
NAVAIDS, approach lighting, and airport
lighting.
|
Add
|
|
(d) Prepare a staff study which includes:
|
Add
|
|
(1) Type of aircraft and user groups that
will be involved in SCIA operations.
|
Add
|
|
(2) Anticipated effect on airport/ airspace
capacity, including projected reductions in
departure delays, airport acceptance rate, and
projected savings in aircraft fuel consumption.
|
Add
|
|
(3) Daily time periods during which the
procedure would be applied.
|
Add
|
|
(4) A preliminary environmental
assessment in accordance with FAA Order
1050.1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures (See Paragraph 416, Preliminary
Environmental Review).
|
Add
|
|
2. After completing steps 1 through 4 above,
the ATM must:
|
Add
|
|
(a) Submit the request for SCIA operations,
to include the completed staff study and a draft
graphic of the ILSStandard Instrument
Approach Procedure, to their OSG for review.
|
Add
|
|
(1) The OSG must coordinate the
procedure with the regional Flight Standards
Division.
|
Add
|
|
(2) When approved, the OSG will process
the package through the FPT for development.
|
Add
|
|
(b) Develop a Letter to Airmen defining
local procedures to be used at least 30 days
before the effective date. Additional means of
publicizing local procedures must be employed
in accordance with Paragraph 424,
Coordination of ATC Procedures.
|
Add
|
|
b. The requirements for conducting SCIA
operations to converging runways are:
|
Add
|
|
1. Operational air traffic control radar.
|
Add
|
|
2. Precision instrument approach procedures
must be established on each runway.
|
Add
|
|
3. Non-intersecting final approach courses.
|
Add
|
|
4. SIAP specifically titled “Converging” and
is published in parenthesis after the title of the
procedure, for example, ILS V Rwy 17
(Converging).
|
Add
|
|
(a) Missed approach points (MAP) must be
at least 3 nautical miles (NM) apart, and
|
Add
|
|
(b) Published missed approach procedures
diverge by at least 45 degrees.
|
Add
|
|
(c) The ATM must designate a primary and
secondary runway for SCIA runway
configurations including separation
responsibility and procedures to be applied in
the event a missed approach is initiated inside
the MAP.
|
Add
|
|
(d) Flight Procedures will determine the
appropriate approach minimums for both
primary and secondary runways for each SCIA
configuration.
|
Add
|
|
5. Converging approaches must not be
conducted simultaneously to runways that
intersect, when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet
or the visibility is less than 3 miles.
|
Add
|
|
6. Converging approaches to runways that do
not intersect may be conducted when the ceiling
is less than 1,000 feet or visibility less than 3 miles
provided all other conditions of this directive are
met.
|
Add
|
|
7. Application of this procedure to
intersecting runways does not relieve the
controller of the responsibility to provide
intersecting runways separation as required in
FAA Order 7110.65, paragraph 3104.
|
Add
|
|
8. A facility directive or letter of agreement
must be developed specifying as a minimum:
|
Add
|
|
(a) The runway configurations to be used
during SCIA operations,
|
Add
|
|
(b) Separation responsibility and
procedures, to be applied, in the event a missed
approach is initiated inside the MAP,
|
Add
|
|
(c) Coordination requirements,
|
Add
|
|
(d) Weather minima applicable to each
configuration, if different from published
minima.
|
Add
|
|
NOTE-
The ATM may establish higher minima than published
on the SIAP to preclude, to the extent feasible, the
possibility of a weather related missed approach.
|
Add
|
|
c. Authorize simultaneous instrument
approaches to converging runways under the
following conditions:
|
Add
|
|
1. Only straightin approaches must be made.
|
Add
|
|
2. All appropriate communication,
navigation, and surveillance systems are
operating normally.
|
Add
|
|
3. Aircraft must be informed on initial
contact, or as soon as possible, that simultaneous
converging approaches are in use. Broadcasting
this information on the ATIS satisfies this
requirement.
|
Add
|
|
4. Weather activity that could impact the final
approach courses must be closely monitored.
Discontinue SCIA operations if weather trends
indicate deteriorating conditions which would
make a missed approach likely.
|
Add
|
|
d. Record any occurrence of simultaneous
missed approaches while conducting SCIA on
FAA Form 72304, Daily Record of Facility
Operation and submit a mandatory occurrence
report (MOR).
|
Paragraph 1049 through 10411
|
|
Renumber 10410 through 10412
|
|