USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

ato

Left Nav - Air Traffic Organization

Spectrum Engineering & Policy

Spectrum engineers are involved from "cradle-to-grave" in nearly all aviation systems. OMB Circular A-11 and DOT Order 5420.3 require that radio frequency spectrum be available before developing or procuring new communications-electronics systems.

Other Responsibilities Include

  • Pre-development — Spectrum engineers assist in determining the proper frequency band for proposed equipment and applicable standards.
  • Development and Production — Spectrum engineers play a key role in testing to ensure that equipment meets specifications for electromagnetic compatibility and radiation hazards criteria. FAA's Technical Center, under the Spectrum Engineering Services' guidance, provides valuable assistance in addressing these issues.
  • Operation — The Regional frequency management offices engineer site-specific radio frequencies for approval by Director of Spectrum Engineering Services. Regional frequency management offices also perform the detailed on-site investigations needed to resolve cases of radio frequency interference.

FAA Weather Cameras

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

The FAA Weather Camera Program improves aviation safety and efficiency by providing pilots with near real-time visual weather data. Pilots, dispatchers, Flight Service Specialists, and National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters receive visual confirmation of weather conditions at airports, mountain passes, and other strategic locations along air routes and areas with elevated accident rates.

Weather cameras give users near real-time images (updated every 10 minutes) of weather conditions prior to takeoff and during flight, via en route weather updates. Multiple camera views are available at each weather camera location. When combined with available textual weather products, weather camera images become a powerful “go-or-no-go” aviation flight decision tool.

Implementation of the weather camera service across the State of Alaska resulted in an 85% reduction in weather-related accidents and a 69% reduction in weather-related flight interruptions from 2007-2014.

The Weather Camera Program currently owns and maintains over 260 camera systems in Alaska, Hawaii, and CONUS. They also host camera images from over 530 non FAA-owned weather camera sites in Alaska, Hawaii, CONUS, and Canada. Current plans call for the installation of 160 new FAA camera sites in Alaska and the Continental U.S. by 2031, and to expand its third-party camera networks by over 100 sites per year.

View weather camera map and images.

Third Party Hosted Information

Advance aviation in your area with Weather Cameras!

An investment in the weather cameras benefits aviation:

  • Reduces weather-related aviation accidents
  • Reduces weather-related flight interruptions
  • Improves aviation flight decision making
  • Enhances Flight Service operations

The FAA helps achieve this goal:

  • Provides technical specifications from proven technology
  • Provides guidance with site selection
  • Connects cameras to existing FAA network infrastructure
  • Hosts camera images on the existing website https://weathercams.faa.gov
  • Leverages existing FAA infrastructure

Please contact WCAMExp@faa.gov to advance aviation safety with weather camera technology.

Contact Us

Friday, May 03, 2024

Flight Service strives to bring the best service possible to its users. To provide us feedback on how we're doing, please choose one of the feedback options below:

FAA/ATO International Performance Benchmarking

Latest FAA/European Benchmark Report

The 2024 report is a joint publication of the Air Traffic Organization System Operations Services of FAA and EUROCONTROL on behalf of the European Union.  It is the 8th in a series of ATM operational comparisons that have been performed since 2009.  It is the first to contain comparisons for both Operational and Cost-Efficiency Performance. It is also the first full report to benchmark these comparisons for conditions prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic (2019) with operations in 2022 when both systems show recovery towards Pre-Pandemic levels. Monthly Operational Performance trends are shown through July of 2023 and Cost-Efficiency trends are shown through 2021.  The report provides demonstrated examples of the Performance Indicators listed in the ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP).  For more information, please contact: John Gulding, in the FAA Office of Performance Analysis.

2024 Report

2024 Comparison of Air Traffic Management-Related Operational Performance: U.S./Europe
The report details the significant changes that occurred through the Covid-19 Pandemic and subsequent recovery.  This US continues to operate delay management on a more tactical basis with only 3 schedule limited airports.  The US, with its higher volume relative to capacity and reliance on Traffic Flow Management, experiences much higher surface delay than Europe. Europe operates more schedule limited airports and experiences more delay in the en-route phase, which requires the coordination of 36 different Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs). Using harmonized metrics, the report provides performance trends for Air Traffic Management Delay, Punctuality and Flight Efficiency. This joint report also includes Cost-Efficiency comparisons for Cost per Flight Hour, Flight Hours per Controller and overall Productivity.  The report uses Purchasing Power Parity conversions as the best means of facilitating cost comparisons.

International benchmarking provides ANSPs a live test bed for assessing how ATC systems may perform if traffic, operating procedures, demand management policy or technology evolve in a way that can be compared to other parts of the world. The benchmark report combines elements integral to the European Performance Scheme as well as measures utilized by FAA management. Although regions of the world have differences in traffic volume or operating conditions, these reports demonstrate it is possible to converge on common measures that allow for fact-driven comparisons of aviation performance at a global level.

Report archive.

2017 Report

2017 Comparison of Air Traffic Management-Related Operational Performance: U.S./Europe
This report provides EU/US trends in aviation performance through calendar years 2015-17. The performance review covers similar geographical areas with the US controlling approximately 50% more flights with approximately 40% less staff. Europe experienced more delay in the en-route phase, which requires the coordination of 37 different Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs). US traffic continued to grow in congested areas while runway construction was underway at several key airports. Using harmonized metrics, the report provides performance trends for Air Traffic Management Delay, Punctuality and Flight Efficiency, which reflect the effects of traffic growth, weather and runway construction. The FAA supports this effort to compare air navigation systems as the results are critical to the FAA maintaining global leadership and achieving U.S. aviation goals.

The value of international benchmarking is the ability to provide ANSPs a live test bed for assessing how ATC systems may perform if traffic, operating procedures, demand management policy or technology evolve in a way that can be compared to other parts of the world. The benchmark report combines elements integral to the European Performance Scheme as well as measures utilized by FAA management. Although regions of the world have differences in traffic volume or operating conditions, these reports demonstrate it is possible to converge on common measures that allow for fact-driven comparisons of aviation performance at a global level.

2015 Report

2015 Comparison of Air Traffic Management-Related Operational Performance: U.S./Europe
This report provides EU/US trends in aviation performance through calendar year 2015 highlighting changes that have occurred since 2013. These include the effects of construction, increases in demand at key facilities as well as areas where overall delay due to traffic management initiatives has decreased. The report introduces two new EU/US initiatives that track changes in the vertical descent profile and key characteristics of traffic management initiatives such as their frequency, duration and number of flights affected

2013 Report

2013 Comparison of Air Traffic Management-Related Operational Performance: U.S./Europe
Provides EU/US trends in aviation performance through calendar year 2013. This report adds a trajectory efficiency indicator for filed flight plans as well as more detailed indicators for ATM imposed delay. The report tracks thunderstorm and winter operations for the US and the subsequent impact on performance.

FAI FSS - Contact Information

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Fairbanks FSS Hub

Pilot Weather Briefing Telephone Numbers

(For Live Briefers, Fast File and TIBS)

Alaska Wide Toll Free:
1-833-252-7433 (AK-BRIEF)

Fairbanks FSS Nation Wide Toll Free:
(Always routed to FAI FSS)
(866) 248-6516

Fairbanks FSS Local Phone:
(907) 474-0137

Satellite Stations (Live Briefer)

Barrow FSS Local Phone
(907) 852-2511

Deadhorse FSS Local Phone
(907) 659-2401

Kotzebue FSS Local Phone
(907) 442-3310

Nome FSS Local Phone
(907) 443-2291

Nome FSS Toll Free
(800) 478-8400

Northway FSS Local Phone
(907) 778-2219


Other Helpful Numbers

Fairbanks ATCT ATIS:
(907) 456-1244

Fairbanks FSS FAX:
(907) 474-0766


Postal Address

Department of Transportation / FAA
Fairbanks FSS
3811 University Ave S
Fairbanks, AK 99709-4661


Administrative

Fairbanks FSS Air Traffic Manager
Phone: (907) 455-1600 - Fax: (907) 479-5649
Email: 9-AAL-FAI-AFSS@faa.gov

Informal South Pacific Air Traffic Services Coordinating Group (ISPACG)

Thursday, July 28, 2022

Purpose

To promote a cost effective South Pacific Air Traffic Services aviation environment that is responsive to change, meets the needs of the aviation industry, is economically sustainable and maintains or enhances present levels of safety.

Participants

The ISPACG was established by multilateral agreement between Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and the United States. It is presently co-chaired by Airways New Zealand and the United States Federal Aviation Administration.

 

Principles

In the conduct of the activities of the ISPACG, the forum applies the following principles:

  • Promote an ATS system that is responsive to and meets the needs of our customers.
  • Ensure that the introduction of new technology and procedures maintains or enhances the present levels of safety.
  • Harmonize ATS practices and procedures consistent with regional and global activity.
  • Undertake activities and provide outputs that are cost effective and efficient for both customers and service providers.
  • Promote advantages in new technology where benefits can be derived.
  • Achieve a cooperative customer/service provider relationship.

Visit the ISPACG website to learn more ISPACG

Alaska Links

Friday, June 27, 2025

Flying to Alaska

Flying to Alaska is an adventure! But it will take some homework. We have teamed up with the FAA Flight Safety Team (FAAST) in Alaska to provide this information as an aid in helping you plan your trip. The link below will take you to the FAAST – Flying In Alaska webpage where you will find lot's of helpful information on flying to and in Alaska. Have a safe and fun trip!

Video